Would it make sense to classify demanding others to use Content Warnings and alt text as harassment?
Looking at the mastodon.social server rules at mastodon.social/about, which, of course, don't mention this.
It just seems like this should be up to moderators to enforce, if CWs and alt text are even required, not vigilante users.
Would love to hear other people's/admins' thoughts.
#FediAdmin #MastoAdmin #CWs #netiquette #fediverse
https://stefanbohacek.online/@stefan/113619955336831423
@stefan My biggest concern about society as a whole is the division I see that comes from people who strongly believe something but are unable to listen to people with opposing views before […]
@stefan @alex ich sehe darin keinen Regelverstoß und würde dies den Nutzern überlassen. Wenn sie sich dadurch belästigt fühlen, können sie ja die betreffenden Accounts muten oder blockieren. […]
@stefan
Demand? Or Request?
[…]
Something I haven't considered are cases of members of one community enforcing their own rules and social norms on folks from another server.
Maybe server admins just need to step up. Either […]
@stefan Partially. NSFW posts absolutely require a CW, anything else is a judgment call. I’ve actually occasionally very respectfully suggested to someone that their CW was unnecessary. But I […]
2024-12-09 allenstenhaus ┃ edited ┃ 1#️
[Long, but hopefully helpful]
@stefan
👎
@stefan Before I decided to launch my own instance a year ago, I decided to join a server owned by another group of people (won't name them here of course), and within I think 10 minutes of […]
@stefan Of course admins should be able to understand & enforce the server rules, regardless of defamatory user attempts to silence political opponents.
@stefan
CW's are one of the very oldest and most irritating topics the HOA / Hall Monitor class loves to go on about
[…]
────
────