7 upvotes, 0 direct replies (showing 0)
View submission: Do non-binary identities reenforce gender stereotypes?
OK then stop confusing me with contrasting petty comments and then hitting me with some actual substance, lol. And no I'm not 60, I'm not even half that.
When my whole point is that gender is bullshit, "non-binary" isn't exactly relevant. I'm rejecting gender as a whole, not just gender as a binary system. Gender as a binary system is even *more* stupid, but like I said trying to categorize people with gender labels is pointless, people are unique, and the traits people can have in common comes from *infinite* factors that far surpass typical gender norms, from culture/upbringing/where you're from, to literally how your parents raised you, even their sexual/intimacy history, etc. so why use such a reductionist logic to take someone's identity and tie it to some gender?
And before you say people do that with religion and other things my stance is the same. Identity is so rich and unique to each person and their entire life determines that, way too complex, and it is pointless to reduce it to a label or even a set of labels.
If you're making the argument that someone can call themselves "masc" or whatever other gender, in the same way they'd call themselves "liberal" or whatever, then sure, but again that's not really the way gender is implemented right now at all whether in the binary crowd or the non binary crowd
There's nothing here!