-5 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
View submission: Introducing Collectible Avatars
Why was the term "NFT" not used in the OP out of curiousity?
Because "avatars" != "NFTs". But "right-click infringing" is a problem directly related to NFTs.
You can't discuss "right-click infringing" without discussing the underlying medium that enables it, which are NFTs in this particular implementation. If digital ownership was implemented in forms other than NFT's, then that term would surface here.
But you can discuss "avatars" without discussing technology at all. Avatars can exist outside the internet.
Comment by hbnsckl at 08/07/2022 at 03:38 UTC
12 upvotes, 2 direct replies
Okay, but...
Collectible Avatars are on the blockchain
Having Collectible Avatars on the blockchain gives you - the purchaser - ownership over your Avatar, no matter where you want to take it, on or off Reddit.
These Avatars are limited edition, meaning a set number of each creator’s Collectible Avatars are available for purchase.
How are avatars not NFTs?