80 upvotes, 3 direct replies (showing 3)
View submission: Introducing Collectible Avatars
Why was the term "NFT" not used in the OP out of curiousity?
Seems like half your recent replies use it.
Comment by [deleted] at 07/07/2022 at 21:38 UTC
35 upvotes, 0 direct replies
You *know* you're not getting a response to that question, I presume?
Comment by [deleted] at 07/07/2022 at 22:43 UTC*
29 upvotes, 1 direct replies
[deleted]
Comment by [deleted] at 08/07/2022 at 03:17 UTC
-3 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Why was the term "NFT" not used in the OP out of curiousity?
Because "avatars" != "NFTs". But "right-click infringing" is a problem directly related to NFTs.
You can't discuss "right-click infringing" without discussing the underlying medium that enables it, which are NFTs in this particular implementation. If digital ownership was implemented in forms other than NFT's, then that term would surface here.
But you can discuss "avatars" without discussing technology at all. Avatars can exist outside the internet.