1 upvotes, 0 direct replies (showing 0)
Objects are epiphenomenal upon subjectivities you mean.
What you are calling an object is a construction picked out from the background of other "objects". An object is nothing but relationships imputed by awareness. In the end there is not two. This is what the paper is pointing at, an object is simply the privileged relationships we choose, there are absences that are equally important to creating said "object". In the end the false dichotomy between subject and object is nullified by the idea of relationship.
There's nothing here!