908 upvotes, 9 direct replies (showing 9)
View submission: Welp this is great isn't it? / s
How does this defend women? This authoritarianism is very thinly veiled
Comment by Russian_Blue_ at 31/01/2025 at 21:51 UTC
611 upvotes, 1 direct replies
It.. dose not. It is using women to promote transphobia.
Comment by Kaya_kana at 31/01/2025 at 22:41 UTC
110 upvotes, 0 direct replies
In the same way segregated bathrooms protected white women back in the day. It doesn't.
Comment by glockops at 31/01/2025 at 23:33 UTC
25 upvotes, 1 direct replies
The men are protecting the women - this is a trend that will continue until women are protected from making decisions entirely.
Comment by SavvySaltyMama813 at 31/01/2025 at 23:15 UTC
19 upvotes, 0 direct replies
It doesn’t. And please if any women did say this helps defend them, please line up. I’d love to know who you are. Source: I’m a woman and removing pronouns doesn’t defend me.
Comment by [deleted] at 31/01/2025 at 21:52 UTC
7 upvotes, 1 direct replies
[deleted]
Comment by Rogue_3 at 31/01/2025 at 23:45 UTC
8 upvotes, 0 direct replies
It's not veiled in the slightest. It's right out in the open.
Comment by a-searcher at 02/02/2025 at 13:18 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
I think it's about the terf view: trans women are "robbing" cis women of their hard worked civil rights, essentially getting them for free since they are not biologically women
Comment by ArcanaSilva at 01/02/2025 at 09:53 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Because clearly, without using pronouns, no one knows that Mary from HR is a woman, and thus she won't be assaulted anymore /s
I'm not from the US so I realised just a few days ago this was being sold as to protect women and....... Yeah. Yeah no. Maybe actually do something to protect women (and that includes trans women for fucks sake) and not do stupid shit that makes them less eligible for jobs
Comment by Little_Morning at 01/02/2025 at 15:38 UTC
0 upvotes, 0 direct replies
None of this is for any citizen's benefit, its only to harm.