https://i.redd.it/f6uf4erebege1.png
created by Russian_Blue_ on 31/01/2025 at 21:16 UTC
2112 upvotes, 104 top-level comments (showing 25)
I don't think this has anything to do with defending women but okay.
Comment by AutoModerator at 31/01/2025 at 21:16 UTC
1 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Please make sure to donate to The Trevor Project and Mermaids through our Just Giving pages linked on this post[2]
1: https://www.reddit.com/r/lgbt/comments/1gps2jw/reddit_is_matching_your_donations_to_the_trevor/
2: https://www.reddit.com/r/lgbt/comments/1gps2jw/reddit_is_matching_your_donations_to_the_trevor/
We are currently in a temporary emergency brigade prevention mode. You may not see your comment appear, that is on purpose. When things have calmed down we will turn this off. Please be patient with the moderators, we're volunteers and lack sleep. Thank you <3
3: https://www.reddit.com/r/MtF/comments/1i6bbxd/a_legal_researchers_guide_to_trump_antitrans/
4: /message/compose/?to=/r/lgbt
Comment by [deleted] at 31/01/2025 at 21:30 UTC
750 upvotes, 5 direct replies
[deleted]
Comment by Normie-scum at 31/01/2025 at 21:46 UTC
911 upvotes, 9 direct replies
How does this defend women? This authoritarianism is very thinly veiled
Comment by Forine110 at 31/01/2025 at 21:48 UTC
423 upvotes, 3 direct replies
oh thank god, this will fix the economy in no time! only the highest priorities for the white house, those pronouns in email signatures were tanking the housing market!
Comment by Amaria77 at 31/01/2025 at 21:40 UTC
204 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Mine are amateur nouns. Can they stay?
Comment by storagesys at 31/01/2025 at 22:03 UTC
185 upvotes, 3 direct replies
either a.) state your pronouns in a different part of your message or b.) dont use any pronouns at all (no I, me, you, we, etc)
malicious compliance
Comment by A-Salen at 31/01/2025 at 21:55 UTC
114 upvotes, 4 direct replies
I'd be strongly tempted to change my first name to an initial to force people who don't know to ask or choose to make an assumption.
Comment by uhhhchaostheory at 31/01/2025 at 22:09 UTC
85 upvotes, 1 direct replies
“Defending women” from what?? Basic grammar? Wow I feel so safe and protected, thank you Mrs president!
Comment by MerakiWho at 31/01/2025 at 21:44 UTC
68 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Oh no!! Pronouns!
Comment by Ravenclaw79 at 31/01/2025 at 21:50 UTC
48 upvotes, 1 direct replies
“Mr. John Smith” or “Ms. Jane Smith” it is, then, I guess
Comment by tree_or_up at 31/01/2025 at 22:25 UTC
32 upvotes, 2 direct replies
This one wonders if the present is a time to discover what language without pronouns looks like. The one is morbidly amused that the issuer of the executive order, the issuer's supports, and the ones carrying out the issuer's orders don't understand the very concept of pronouns
Comment by CampyBiscuit at 31/01/2025 at 22:33 UTC
28 upvotes, 2 direct replies
That workplace sucks. Don't do it. It's not even legal
None of the EOs are legal. They are just orders/wishes. Any company or organization following them is just willfully complying. There is no legal basis to comply with anything at this time.
If some random company is enforcing this, file a complaint with the ACLU now.
Comment by 0ppositeTrash at 31/01/2025 at 21:54 UTC
52 upvotes, 2 direct replies
Comment by GuardianLexi at 31/01/2025 at 22:14 UTC
24 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Man this really helps to defend women... or something
Comment by Father_Chewy_Louis at 31/01/2025 at 22:13 UTC
15 upvotes, 1 direct replies
How can I tell if Alex, Sam or Jamie are a guy or girl or neither!?
Comment by GothyTrannyBethany at 31/01/2025 at 22:03 UTC
12 upvotes, 0 direct replies
How tf does removing pronouns "Protect women"?? The mental gymnastics with these people are truly unfathomable
Comment by [deleted] at 31/01/2025 at 22:19 UTC
12 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Took them long enough to step in for us women 😔😔 the pronoun nightmares are real guys /s
Comment by astrodude23 at 01/02/2025 at 01:35 UTC
12 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Just made this comment elsewhere, but want to increase visibility for anyone else in the DOD who might see this:
Every other department can do this but NOT the DOD!
A couple years ago, Republicans in the House tried to slip in a provision in the NDAA that made it so that supervisors couldn't mandate pronouns in signatures, but Senate Dems countered with making it so that they can't be *prohibited* either.
That language made it in and is now in Title 10 USC Section 986[1].
That's an illegal order you just received, friend.
Comment by [deleted] at 31/01/2025 at 22:40 UTC
9 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Surely *this* will lower the price of eggs! /s
Comment by Commie_Vladimir at 31/01/2025 at 22:36 UTC
9 upvotes, 0 direct replies
We did it, America! We saved women!
Comment by JonM313 at 31/01/2025 at 22:40 UTC
7 upvotes, 0 direct replies
"Defending women". Yeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaahhhhh right.
Comment by UnbearablyBareBear at 31/01/2025 at 22:36 UTC
5 upvotes, 0 direct replies
I'm not sure exactly how removing all pronouns from email signatures helps to defend women. I guess it stops them from being yelled at by those people who throw a fit whenever they see pronouns on screen, but a better solution would be to give those people therapy.
Comment by ace5762 at 31/01/2025 at 22:49 UTC
6 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Don't comply.
Comment by stray_r at 31/01/2025 at 23:22 UTC
6 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Replace every pronoun in every email with [pronoun redacted]
Comment by Sharyat at 31/01/2025 at 23:30 UTC
6 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Thank god women are protected from the scary pronouns while they ban abortion and gender equality policies for those same women.
