Comment by K3R3G3 on 12/02/2021 at 09:06 UTC

3 upvotes, 0 direct replies (showing 0)

View submission: Removing sexually explicit content from r/all

View parent comment

But that doesn't get you what's upvoted most, just one random. This is a real crappy move - specifically, the fact there hasn't been a nsfw-included or nsfw-free created. This is a simple taking away. Just a unilateral major change based on a vocal minority complaining. No vote, no democratic process. When did complainers start getting their way without any general discussion, polling, etc? Highly damaging trend, and I'm not just talking about this site on that part.

It'd be great if you worked out the filtering *first*, then there wouldn't be an issue and you could make no-nsfw the default and nsfw optional for /r/all. It's difficult to have faith in a future filter when the site is the age it is and still a simple search is ineffective.

Replies

There's nothing here!