39 upvotes, 3 direct replies (showing 3)
There's sufficient evidence that the photos are stolen/contain underage material. It's obvious, them being celebrities helps a lot.
They can't just automatically ban material just because it's *implied* that the images are stolen, as stupid as that may sound to you.
Comment by flyryan at 07/09/2014 at 14:43 UTC
6 upvotes, 1 direct replies
They can't just automatically ban material just because it's implied that the images are stolen, as stupid as that may sound to you.
They *can* do whatever they want and have proved it numerous times. There wasn't even anything illegal connected to /r/jailbait when they removed that.
Comment by cardevitoraphicticia at 07/09/2014 at 12:46 UTC
12 upvotes, 0 direct replies
If I remember correctly, the meta-data showed that the images were taken when she was 18 and the publicist just lied about it to get the pictures taken down.
Comment by spacehogg at 07/09/2014 at 14:57 UTC
0 upvotes, 0 direct replies
Even though everyone knows it is? I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to prove.