1 upvotes, 0 direct replies (showing 0)
View submission: Do non-binary identities reenforce gender stereotypes?
Not at all, though it is always fair be clear with your audience when you are imposing a prescriptive moral preference about how a word ought to be used rather than applying the most common meaning. It’s not a problem to say “I am using this word in a specific way for specific reasons.“
I say “for now” because language changes are complex and long-reaching. It’s hard to know for certain what is essentially the style preference of the day vs. what will remain an enduring mainstream usage.
The primary definition of “woman” has been observed and documented for a millennium, since prior to the standardization of Early Modern English. I’m happy to acknowledge all usages; I’m pragmatic about assuming that definitions promoted right now will inevitably overtake the conventional understanding of the word, which has been the most stable and enduring sense of “woman“ in English-language usage for many hundreds of years.
There is no need to “revert” or drop either meaning. People use competing and alternative definitions of words all the time. I just don’t know that people who would like their current definition to be the *primary* meaning in English will ultimately compel that change.
There's nothing here!