0 upvotes, 1 direct replies (showing 1)
View submission: COVID denialism and policy clarifications
NNN was built on scientific illiteracy and conspiracy theory nonsense.
Right. We're scientifically illiterate, but you don't even second guess something like how the flu went from 38,000,000 cases in 2019-2020, down to 1,822 during 2020-2021. Or, I mean, the fact that they are heavily censoring anyone who wants to tell their testimony of adverse vaccine side effects.
M'kay.
Everything is "conspiracy theory nonsense" until it comes to pass six months after the fact. Two years ago, "identification passports" were considered a conspiracy theory. Now people are getting experimental inoculations in their arms to get them just to be able to buy a fucking Big Mac.
But then you want to call *us* stupid. Ya'll don't want civil discourse, you just want to be right, even when you're not.
Comment by Magic_Corn at 02/09/2021 at 03:36 UTC
1 upvotes, 1 direct replies
Flu numbers decreased because mask and social distancing work.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6937a6.htm[1][2]
1: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6937a6.htm
2: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6937a6.htm
Vaccine mandates have existed for centuries and have been constitutional for over 100 years, as Supreme Court ruled in 1905 Jacobson v Massachusetts.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/197/11/[3][4]
3: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/197/11/
4: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/197/11/
There took exactly 2 google searches. If you want civil discourse, bring evidence based argument to the table. NNN members could have easily found this information if they were interested in discourse and reaching an evidence based conclusion.