-1 upvotes, 0 direct replies (showing 0)
View submission: COVID denialism and policy clarifications
My favorite part is "This includes falsified medical data and faked WHO/CDC advice."
Problem being, The WHO and CDC have repeatedly published self-contradicting information over the past 18 months. And *both* have blatantly ignored *actual* scientists who have been screaming that the existing criteria for considering something an aerosol vs a droplet are utter rubbish based on misreading a single 60-year old paper about TB[1].
1: https://www.wired.com/story/the-teeny-tiny-scientific-screwup-that-helped-covid-kill/
Reminds me of an old Doonesbury comic - "Will revisionism be covered on the test?" "No, the truth will suffice".
There's nothing here!