2 upvotes, 2 direct replies (showing 2)
View submission: COVID denialism and policy clarifications
No there wasn't.
"Diversity of thought" is worthless without a shared way to validate those thoughts, and when one side rejects the validation methodology (science), then it won't lead to new discoveries.
Just because you have a thought doesn't mean it's valuable.
Comment by wizzlepants at 01/09/2021 at 20:19 UTC
2 upvotes, 0 direct replies
This is what happens when an individualistic society starts raising morons instead of critical thinkers. Any thought I think of must be exceptional. After all, I thought of it!
Comment by KaraiDGL at 02/09/2021 at 14:57 UTC
0 upvotes, 1 direct replies
By people who reject validation methodology do you mean the people screeching that ivermectin is only for horses? Genuinely curious.