Wouldn't this be dependent on the other discussion of IRIs, since gemtext can have arbitrary unicode? Also would require clients to NFC normalize the prefix/heading lines before doing the matching. 23 dic. 2020 19:40:00 John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org>: > > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 7:51 PM Philip Linde <linde.philip at gmail.com> wrote: > ? >> It might be more robust to define the fragment as referring to the >> first heading line that has the fragment content as a prefix, but >> that's still prone to break with document changes. > > Even HTML fragments break if their referents are deleted.? Nothing is completely immune. >> For a good balance, one might have the fragment be a an exact match of >> the heading line you refer to > > That's reasonable, but I think a prefix match would suffice; that way you aren't tempted to make headings overly short in order to keep fragments small. > > > > John Cowan ? ? ? ? ?http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan ? ? ? ?cowan at ccil.org > In politics, obedience and support are the same thing. ?--Hannah Arendt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20201223/3792 4367/attachment.htm>
---
Previous in thread (10 of 27): 🗣️ John Cowan (cowan (a) ccil.org)
Next in thread (12 of 27): 🗣️ Luke Emmet (luke (a) marmaladefoo.com)