On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 7:51 PM Philip Linde <linde.philip at gmail.com> wrote: > It might be more robust to define the fragment as referring to the > first heading line that has the fragment content as a prefix, but > that's still prone to break with document changes. > Even HTML fragments break if their referents are deleted. Nothing is completely immune. > For a good balance, one might have the fragment be a an exact match of > the heading line you refer to > That's reasonable, but I think a prefix match would suffice; that way you aren't tempted to make headings overly short in order to keep fragments small. John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org In politics, obedience and support are the same thing. --Hannah Arendt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20201223/416d 9569/attachment.htm>
---
Previous in thread (9 of 27): 🗣️ Philip Linde (linde.philip (a) gmail.com)
Next in thread (11 of 27): 🗣️ William Orr (will (a) worrbase.com)