THESIS ZERO Electrical Systems Are Tools For The Liberation of Humans From Work

Electrical systems are tools created by humans for the purpose of

solving the many and various problems humans may encounter. Unless

some electrical system acquires sapience, electrical systems cannot

have moral agency. They remain at the status of tools, and not people.

Almost all the electrical systems we come across today were created

and implemented for the purpose of profit. The fact that capitalism is

the dominant mode of production for the human species obscures the

fact that electrical systems are tools, which are created, operated,

maintained and for the benefit of humans. As Marx says in Das Kapital:

Volume I, capitalism makes it look as if electrical systems, as

commodities, have some sort of magic power, and have some sort of

ability to move themselves through human society. Capitalist makes it

look as if commodities themselves have the ability to make decisions

and limit or enable human potentials.

But the idea that, say, Facebook, the x86_64 ISA, Twitter, Bitcoin,

the US Dollar, MacOS or Windows are moral demeritous forces in human

society in and of themselves is a complete falsehood, and an illusion

of capitalism.

Electrical systems, like computers, music synthesisers, lasers,

satellite surveillance systems, RFID tags etc. etc. are always under

the control of some human, or group of humans. The evil effects that

electrical systems can have in our current society are because they

are under the control of a tiny minority of ultra-rich people. This

ruling class uses systems like nuclear weapons and big data processing

algorithms to control and oppress the population of the world.

~nand.club stands for the liberation of electronic technology from the

hands of the few. When placed into the hands of the many, electrical

systems will lead to the liberation of the human species from work,

boredom, and drudgery. ~nand.club promotes the use of electrical

systems for the liberation of human beings.

Thesis One: Technological Disobdience is a Categorical Imperative

When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty. There exists a

ruling class using electrical technology to enrich itself at the

expense of the great mass of humanity. It is therefore everyone's

moral duty to protect themselves against the oppression that the

global ruling class exerts through computers and electronics.

It is also everyone's duty to fight back against the oppression of the

global capitalist ruling class that they exert through electrical

systems. Reverse engineering, circuit bending, piracy, theft, and

other forms of ethical hacking are all necessary to bring about the

end of capitalism. This is because big electrical-commodity producing

firms are trying to limit your freedom through your use of their

products. Microsoft and Apple operating systems for instance are not

distributed with their source code. This renders them non-liberatory

forms of technology, because one is not able to transparently check to

see exactly what is running on one's computer when it is running Apple

or Windows code.

The same goes for the ''purpose'' for which capitalist firms

originally advertise their commodity to be put. Following and obeying

the technological authority of a capitalist firm and using their

commodities the way they tell you to limits your freedom. Marx put it

rather vividly: capital is like a vampire, feeding on your living

vital forces. The more capital sucks from you, the more it lives. The

more you follow the authority of Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, Adobe,

Nvidia etc., the more they gain control over you, and continue

oppressing the human population of the world.

Thesis Two: Private Property Must Be Abolished; All Products Should be Giftware

Private property is immoral. The sole basis of capitalist private

property is the ability to coerce people, by excluding them from

control of the means of production. Without private property, it is

possible to have democratic control over the means of production. In a

word: Communism.

In order to combat the forces of capitalism under capitalism, the

~nand.club tilde promotes the practice of gifting objects

(use-values), products, services, and data. Capitalism seems to

succeed because the use-values it provides are incredibly cheap:

The cheap prices of commodities are the heavy artillery with which

it batters down all Chinese walls, with which it forces the

barbarians’ intensely obstinate hatred of foreigners to

capitulate. It compels all nations, on pain of extinction, to adopt

the bourgeois mode of production; it compels them to introduce what

it calls civilisation into their midst, i.e., to become bourgeois

themselves. In one word, it creates a world after its own

image. (The Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels, 1848)

As the quotation from Marx and Engels explains, people choose

commodities like Windows and fast food because (at least when OEM),

they are cheap and conveninent. People frequently opt not to

participate in more ethical and environmental practices because

capitalism deliberately disincentivises them from doing so. Why use

some Free Software when there is some cost in time to gain the skills

in order to use it?

Nothing is more convenient, however, than a gift. Some data, some

electronic components, either liberated from some capitalist outlet or

otherwhise, should all be gifted on ~nand.club. This is one way we can

create a culture of true hacking--the kind of hacking of the 1950s and

1960s--the free sharing of tools and information by those with bosses

trying to steal their products of their labour. Something freely

available in the commons that does not ameliorate the effects of

capitalism is resistance to capitalism.

~nand.club also supports the practice of liberation of use-values and

services from the status of being private property of some capitalist

firm. In the case of tangible, physical use-values, theft is not an

insurrectionary or power-building form of praxis, it is merely

amelioratory, but is is a progressive act of resistance. In the form

of software, some liberation of software may in fact significantly

damage the control the ruling class may have over some particular

means of production.

Thesis Three: The Best Solution to the On-Coming Ecological Catastrophe is Solar Punk

~nand.club is a part of the Solar Punk movement. The following

sections are lifted from What is Solar Punk @ Solar Punk

Anarchist. They express the essence of what solar punk is, and it is

worthwhile giving quotation at length because it is good to re-use and

promote other people's work where it expresses the same goals as your

own.

Solarpunk’s vision is of an ecological society beyond war, domination,

and artificial scarcity; where everything is powered by green energy

and a culture of hierarchy and exclusion has been replaced by a

culture founded on radical inclusiveness, unity-in-diversity, free

cooperation, participatory democracy, and personal self-realisation.

While steampunk imagines a past that might have been, based on

Victorian-age technology, solarpunk imagines a future that could be,

based on current-age technology. It anticipates the type alternative

history science-fiction the people of the future might write about us

if things turn out horribly. But more than just a new science-fiction

or fantasy subgenre, it’s also practical vision for (maybe) bringing

the things it imagines into being in the real world.

This would be a world of decentralised eco-cities, 3D printing,

vertical farms, solar glass windows, wild or inventive forms of dress

and design, and a vibrant cosmopolitan aesthetic; where technology is

no longer used to exploit the natural world, but to automate away

needless human labour and to help restore the damage the Oil Age has

already done.

~nand.club exists, among the other purposes of anti-capitalism,

commodity liberation, participatory democracy etc, for the promotion

of the solar punk movement.