Solar power eliminates utility bills in U.S. home

2007-06-06 10:52:40

Solar power eliminates utility bills in U.S. home

By Jon Hurdle Thu Jan 18 2007, 9:24 AM ET

EAST AMWELL, New Jersey (Reuters) - Michael Strizki heats and cools his house

year-round and runs a full range of appliances including such power-guzzlers as

a hot tub and a wide-screen TV without paying a penny in utility bills.

ADVERTISEMENT

His conventional-looking family home in the pinewoods of western New Jersey is

the first in the United States to show that a combination of solar and hydrogen

power can generate all the electricity needed for a home.

The Hopewell Project, named for a nearby town, comes at a time of increasing

concern over U.S. energy security and worries over the effects of burning

fossil fuels on the climate.

"People understand that climate change is a big concern but they don't know

what they can do about it," said Gian-Paolo Caminiti of Renewable Energy

International, the commercial arm of the project. "There's a psychological

dividend in doing the right thing," he said.

Strizki runs the 3,000-square-foot house with electricity generated by a

1,000-square-foot roof full of photovoltaic cells on a nearby building, an

electrolyzer that uses the solar power to generate hydrogen from water, and a

number of hydrogen tanks that store the gas until it is needed by the fuel

cell.

In the summer, the solar panels generate 60 percent more electricity than the

super-insulated house needs. The excess is stored in the form of hydrogen which

is used in the winter -- when the solar panels can't meet all the domestic

demand -- to make electricity in the fuel cell. Strizki also uses the hydrogen

to power his fuel-cell driven car, which, like the domestic power plant, is

pollution-free.

Solar power currently contributes only 0.1 percent of U.S. energy needs but the

number of photovoltaic installations grew by 20 percent in 2006, and the cost

of making solar panels is dropping by about 7 percent annually, according to

the Solar Energy Industries Association.

As costs decline and the search accelerates for clean alternatives to expensive

and dirty fossil fuels, some analysts predict solar is poised for a significant

expansion in the next five to 10 years.

STATE SUPPORT

The New Jersey project, which opened in October 2006 after four years of

planning and building, cost around $500,000, some $225,000 of which was

provided by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities. The state, a leading

supporter of renewable energy, aims to have 20 percent of its energy coming

from renewables by 2020, and currently has the largest number of solar-power

installations of any U.S. state except California.

New Jersey's utility regulator supported the project because it helps achieve

the state's renewable-energy goals, said Doyal Siddell a spokesman for the

agency.

"The solar-hydrogen residence project provides a tremendous opportunity to

reduce greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming," he said.

The project also got equipment and expertise from a number of commercial

sponsors including Exide, which donated some $50,000 worth of batteries, and

Swageloc, an Ohio company that provided stainless steel piping costing around

$28,000. Strizki kicked in about $100,000 of his own money.

While the cost may deter all but wealthy environmentalists from converting

their homes, Strizki and his associates stress the project is designed to be

replicated and that the price tag on the prototype is a lot higher than

imitators would pay. Now that first-time costs of research and design have been

met, the price would be about $100,000, Strizki said.

But that's still too high for the project to be widely replicated, said

Marchant Wentworth of the Union of Concerned Scientists, an environmental group

in Washington. To be commonly adopted, such installations would have to be able

to sell excess power to the grid, generating a revenue stream that could be

used to attract capital, he said.

"You need to make the financing within reach of real people," Wentworth said.

Caminiti argues that the cost of the hydrogen/solar setup works out at about

$4,000 a year when its $100,000 cost is spread over the anticipated 25-year

lifespan of the equipment. That's still a lot higher than the $1,500 a year the

average U.S. homeowner spends on energy, according to the federal government.

Even if gasoline costs averaging about $1,000 per car annually are included in

the energy mix, the renewables option is still more expensive than the grid/

gasoline combination.

But for Strizki and his colleagues, the house is about a lot more than the

bottom line. It's about energy security at a time when the federal government

is seeking to reduce dependence on fossil fuels from the Middle East, and it's

about sustaining a lifestyle without emitting greenhouse gases.

For the 51-year-old Strizki, the project is his life's work. "I have dedicated

my life to making the planet a better place," he said.