< Get ready to hamsterization!

Parent

~beefox

for sure!! and yeah the idea does look simple i was just sharing how i create my presence on the internet c:

and yeah absolutely, i strive for minimum backwards compatability equivelent to the backwards compatability javascript has (although i never have my site relying on javascript, which is for the most part like 4 decades at this point (though there have been one or two minor breaking changes over the years), its just a good mesure of "if your computer knows javascript exists, my site will work"). I do have some progressive enhancements so the my sites will be a bit nicer to use on newer machines but otherwise they work absolutely fine on any machine is the idea

and also; well written code that works on most machines is also accessible code, and making accessible sites is one of my most important rules. if a site breaks accessibility in my eyes it is a failure as it does not let anyone read it.

Write a reply

Replies

~turboblack wrote:

thanks for the answer.

The last time we checked the work was on Windows 95, which runs on 8 RAM on a 386 SX at 25 MHz, and this technology is almost 40 years old! so for me it is a great success that the site and templates are compatible with a 40 year old computer