Updated by:
Keywords: RADIUS, remote authentication dial in user service, attributes, IPv6
Network Working Group B. Aboba
Request for Comments: 3162 Microsoft
Category: Standards Track G. Zorn
Cisco Systems
D. Mitton
Circular Logic UnLtd.
August 2001
RADIUS and IPv6
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This document specifies the operation of RADIUS (Remote
Authentication Dial In User Service) when run over IPv6 as well as
the RADIUS attributes used to support IPv6 network access.
1. Introduction
This document specifies the operation of RADIUS [4]-[8] over IPv6
[13] as well as the RADIUS attributes used to support IPv6 network
access.
Note that a NAS sending a RADIUS Access-Request may not know a-priori
whether the host will be using IPv4, IPv6, or both. For example,
within PPP, IPv6CP [11] occurs after LCP, so that address assignment
will not occur until after RADIUS authentication and authorization
has completed.
Therefore it is presumed that the IPv6 attributes described in this
document MAY be sent along with IPv4-related attributes within the
same RADIUS message and that the NAS will decide which attributes to
use. The NAS SHOULD only allocate addresses and prefixes that the
client can actually use, however. For example, there is no need for
Aboba, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 3162 RADIUS and IPv6 August 2001
the NAS to reserve use of an IPv4 address for a host that only
supports IPv6; similarly, a host only using IPv4 or 6to4 [12] does
not require allocation of an IPv6 prefix.
The NAS can provide IPv6 access natively, or alternatively, via other
methods such as IPv6 within IPv4 tunnels [15] or 6over4 [14]. The
choice of method for providing IPv6 access has no effect on RADIUS
usage per se, although if it is desired that an IPv6 within IPv4
tunnel be opened to a particular location, then tunnel attributes
should be utilized, as described in [6], [7].
1.1. Requirements language
In this document, the key words "MAY", "MUST, "MUST NOT", "optional",
"recommended", "SHOULD", and "SHOULD NOT", are to be interpreted as
described in [1].
2. Attributes
2.1. NAS-IPv6-Address
Description
This Attribute indicates the identifying IPv6 Address of the NAS
which is requesting authentication of the user, and SHOULD be
unique to the NAS within the scope of the RADIUS server. NAS-
IPv6-Address is only used in Access-Request packets. NAS-IPv6-
Address and/or NAS-IP-Address MAY be present in an Access-Request
packet; however, if neither attribute is present then NAS-
Identifier MUST be present.
A summary of the NAS-IPv6-Address Attribute format is shown below.
The fields are transmitted from left to right.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length | Address
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Address
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Address
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Address
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Address |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Aboba, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 3162 RADIUS and IPv6 August 2001
Type
95 for NAS-IPv6-Address
Length
18
Address
The Address field is 16 octets.
3.2. Framed-Interface-Id
Description
This Attribute indicates the IPv6 interface identifier to be
configured for the user. It MAY be used in Access-Accept packets.
If the Interface-Identifier IPv6CP option [11] has been
successfully negotiated, this Attribute MUST be included in an
Access-Request packet as a hint by the NAS to the server that it
would prefer that value. It is recommended, but not required,
that the server honor the hint.
A summary of the Framed-Interface-Id Attribute format is shown below.
The fields are transmitted from left to right.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length | Interface-Id
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Interface-Id
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Interface-Id |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Type
96 for Framed-Interface-Id
Length
10
Interface-Id
The Interface-Id field is 8 octets.
Aboba, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 3162 RADIUS and IPv6 August 2001
2.3. Framed-IPv6-Prefix
Description
This Attribute indicates an IPv6 prefix (and corresponding route)
to be configured for the user. It MAY be used in Access-Accept
packets, and can appear multiple times. It MAY be used in an
Access-Request packet as a hint by the NAS to the server that it
would prefer these prefix(es), but the server is not required to
honor the hint. Since it is assumed that the NAS will plumb a
route corresponding to the prefix, it is not necessary for the
server to also send a Framed-IPv6-Route attribute for the same
prefix.
A summary of the Framed-IPv6-Prefix Attribute format is shown below.
The fields are transmitted from left to right.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length | Reserved | Prefix-Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Prefix
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Prefix
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Prefix
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Prefix |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Type
97 for Framed-IPv6-Prefix
Length
At least 4 and no larger than 20.
Reserved
This field, which is reserved and MUST be present, is always set
to zero.
Prefix-Length
The length of the prefix, in bits. At least 0 and no larger than
128.
Aboba, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 3162 RADIUS and IPv6 August 2001
Prefix
The Prefix field is up to 16 octets in length. Bits outside of
the Prefix-Length, if included, must be zero.
2.4. Login-IPv6-Host
Description
This Attribute indicates the system with which to connect the
user, when the Login-Service Attribute is included. It MAY be
used in Access-Accept packets. It MAY be used in an Access-
Request packet as a hint to the server that the NAS would prefer
to use that host, but the server is not required to honor the
hint.
A summary of the Login-IPv6-Host Attribute format is shown below.
The fields are transmitted from left to right.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length | Address
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Address
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Address
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Address
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Address |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Type
98 for Login-IPv6-Host
Length
18
Aboba, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 3162 RADIUS and IPv6 August 2001
Address
The Address field is 16 octets in length. The value
0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF indicates that the NAS SHOULD
allow the user to select an address or name to be connected to.
The value 0 indicates that the NAS SHOULD select a host to connect
the user to. Other values indicate the address the NAS SHOULD
connect the user to.
2.5. Framed-IPv6-Route
Description
This Attribute provides routing information to be configured for
the user on the NAS. It is used in the Access-Accept packet and
can appear multiple times.
A summary of the Framed-IPv6-Route Attribute format is shown below.
The fields are transmitted from left to right.
0 1 2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
| Type | Length | Text ...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Type
99 for Framed-IPv6-Route
Length
>=3
Text
The Text field is one or more octets, and its contents are
implementation dependent. The field is not NUL (hex 00)
terminated. It is intended to be human readable and MUST NOT
affect operation of the protocol.
For IPv6 routes, it SHOULD contain a destination prefix optionally
followed by a slash and a decimal length specifier stating how
many high order bits of the prefix to use. That is followed by a
space, a gateway address, a space, and one or more metrics
(encoded in decimal) separated by spaces. Prefixes and addresses
are formatted as described in [16]. For example,
"2000:0:0:106::/64 2000::106:a00:20ff:fe99:a998 1".
Aboba, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 3162 RADIUS and IPv6 August 2001
Whenever the gateway address is the IPv6 unspecified address the
IP address of the user SHOULD be used as the gateway address. The
unspecified address can be expressed in any of the acceptable
formats described in [16]. For example, "2000:0:0:106::/64 :: 1".
2.6. Framed-IPv6-Pool
Description
This Attribute contains the name of an assigned pool that SHOULD
be used to assign an IPv6 prefix for the user. If a NAS does not
support multiple prefix pools, the NAS MUST ignore this Attribute.
A summary of the Framed-IPv6-Pool Attribute format is shown below.
The fields are transmitted from left to right.
0 1 2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length | String...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Type
100 for Framed-IPv6-Pool
Length
>= 3
String
The string field contains the name of an assigned IPv6 prefix pool
configured on the NAS. The field is not NUL (hex 00) terminated.
3. Table of Attributes
The following table provides a guide to which attributes may be found
in which kinds of packets, and in what quantity.
Request Accept Reject Challenge Accounting # Attribute
Request
0-1 0 0 0 0-1 95 NAS-IPv6-Address
0-1 0-1 0 0 0-1 96 Framed-Interface-Id
0+ 0+ 0 0 0+ 97 Framed-IPv6-Prefix
0+ 0+ 0 0 0+ 98 Login-IPv6-Host
0 0+ 0 0 0+ 99 Framed-IPv6-Route
0 0-1 0 0 0-1 100 Framed-IPv6-Pool
Aboba, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 3162 RADIUS and IPv6 August 2001
4. References
[1] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March, 1997.
[2] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of Unicode and ISO
10646", RFC 2044, October 1996.
[3] Aboba, B. and J. Vollbrecht, "Proxy Chaining and Policy
Implementation in Roaming", RFC 2607, June 1999.
[4] Rigney, C., Rubens, A., Simpson, W. and S. Willens, "Remote
Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC 2865, June
2000.
[5] Rigney, C., "RADIUS Accounting", RFC 2866, June 2000.
[6] Zorn, G., Mitton, D. and B. Aboba, "RADIUS Accounting
Modifications for Tunnel Protocol Support", RFC 2867, June
2000.
[7] Zorn, G., Leifer, D., Rubens, A., Shriver, J., Holdrege, M.
and I. Goyret, "RADIUS Attributes for Tunnel Protocol Support",
RFC 2868, June 2000.
[8] Rigney, C., Willats, W. and P. Calhoun, "RADIUS Extensions",
RFC 2869, June 2000.
[9] Kent S. and R. Atkinson, "Security Architecture for the
Internet Protocol", RFC 2401, November 1998.
[10] Alvestrand, H. and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA
Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434, October
1998.
[11] Haskin, D. and E. Allen, "IP Version 6 over PPP", RFC 2472,
December 1998.
[12] Carpenter, B. and K. Moore, "Connection of IPv6 Domains via
IPv4 Clouds", RFC 3056, February 2001.
[13] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6)
Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998.
[14] Carpenter, B. and C. Jung, "Transmission of IPv6 over IPv4
Domains without Explicit Tunnels", RFC 2529, March 1999.
Aboba, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 3162 RADIUS and IPv6 August 2001
[15] Gilligan, R. and E. Nordmark, "Transition Mechanisms for IPv6
Hosts and Routers", RFC 2893, August 2000.
[16] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
Architecture", RFC 2373, July 1998.
5. Security Considerations
This document describes the use of RADIUS for the purposes of
authentication, authorization and accounting in IPv6-enabled
networks. In such networks, the RADIUS protocol may run either over
IPv4 or over IPv6. Known security vulnerabilities of the RADIUS
protocol are described in [3], [4] and [8].
Since IPSEC [9] is mandatory to implement for IPv6, it is expected
that running RADIUS implementations supporting IPv6 will typically
run over IPSEC. Where RADIUS is run over IPSEC and where
certificates are used for authentication, it may be desirable to
avoid management of RADIUS shared secrets, so as to leverage the
improved scalability of public key infrastructure.
Within RADIUS, a shared secret is used for hiding of attributes such
as User-Password [4] and Tunnel-Password [7]. In addition, the
shared secret is used in computation of the Response Authenticator
[4], as well as the Message-Authenticator attribute [8]. Therefore,
in RADIUS a shared secret is used to provide confidentiality as well
as integrity protection and authentication. As a result, only use of
IPSEC ESP with a non-null transform can provide security services
sufficient to substitute for RADIUS application-layer security.
Therefore, where IPSEC AH or ESP null is used, it will typically
still be necessary to configure a RADIUS shared secret.
However, where RADIUS is run over IPSEC ESP with a non-null
transform, the secret shared between the NAS and the RADIUS server
MAY NOT be configured. In this case, a shared secret of zero length
MUST be assumed.
Aboba, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 3162 RADIUS and IPv6 August 2001
6. IANA Considerations
This document requires the assignment of six new RADIUS attribute
numbers for the following attributes:
NAS-IPv6-Address
Framed-Interface-Id
Framed-IPv6-Prefix
Login-IPv6-Host
Framed-IPv6-Route
Framed-IPv6-Pool
See section 3 for the registered list of numbers.
7. Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino of IIJ
Research Laboratory, Darran Potter of Cisco and Carl Rigney of Lucent
for contributions to this document.
Aboba, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 3162 RADIUS and IPv6 August 2001
8. Authors' Addresses
Bernard Aboba
Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052
Phone: +1 425 936 6605
Fax: +1 425 936 7329
EMail: bernarda@microsoft.com
Glen Zorn
Cisco Systems, Inc.
500 108th Avenue N.E., Suite 500
Bellevue, WA 98004
Phone: +1 425 471 4861
EMail: gwz@cisco.com
Dave Mitton
Circular Logic UnLtd.
733 Turnpike Street #154
North Andover, MA 01845
Phone: 978 683-1814
Email: david@mitton.com
Aboba, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 3162 RADIUS and IPv6 August 2001
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Aboba, et al. Standards Track [Page 12]