https://textprotocol.org https://textprotocol.org/contact βοΈγ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ» DNS SERVICE DISCOVERY /dns/textprotocol.org/tcp/1961 [01] /dns/textprotocol.org/tcp/1965/tls [02] /dns/textprotocol.org/udp/1968/quic [03] βοΈγ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ» REQUEST-RESPONSE [04] text://textprotocol.org/β [05] β 20 text/plain;charset=utf-8;β hello text://protocol!β© => text://textprotocol.org/license.txt rel=license CC0-1.0β© β <end of connection> βοΈγ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ» RESPONSE CODE [06] 20 text/plain;charset=utf-8;β [07] 30 text://textprotocol.org/β [08] 40 β οΈβ [09] βοΈγ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ» CONTENT TYPE text/plain;charset=utf-8; βοΈγ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ» LINK LINE [10] => text://textprotocol.org/license.txt rel=license CC0-1.0β© βοΈγ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ» LICENSE CC0-1.0 βοΈγ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ» [01] 1961 CE β Mercury's first crewed flight. βΏ [02] 1965 CE β Gemini's first crewed flight. βοΈ [03] 1968 CE β Apollo's first crewed flight. [04] UTF-8 NFC. IRI/URI/URN/URL β absolute, normalized, fully qualified. [05] IRI request line. CRLF terminated. 1,048,576 bytes long. [06] Response code line. 1,048,576 bytes long. End of connection terminated. [07] 20 OK content-type response β space separated. Followed by the content β CRLF separated. [08] 30 REDIRECT IRI response β space separated. [09] 40 NOK response. Optional space separated description β control characters escaped. [10] Link line: '=>' οΉ’ space οΉ’ IRI. Optional space separated description β escaped. EOL terminated. 1,048,576 bytes long. βοΈγ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»
This seems to be derivative of Gemini. I can't tell if it's supposed to be helping Gemini, or some kind of hostile rebranding. It'd be nice if the laconic creator made his/her intentions clear. I note that @textprotocol is restricted on Twitter: https://twitter.com/textprotocol "Caution: This account is temporarily restricted Youβre seeing this warning because there has been some unusual activity from this account. Do you still want to view it?" What's going on? Mk -- Martin Keegan, @mk270, https://mk.ucant.org/
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 8:52 AM Martin Keegan <martin@no.ucant.org> wrote: > > This seems to be derivative of Gemini. I can't tell if it's supposed to be > helping Gemini, or some kind of hostile rebranding. It'd be nice if the > laconic creator made his/her intentions clear. > > I note that @textprotocol is restricted on Twitter: > > https://twitter.com/textprotocol > > "Caution: This account is temporarily restricted > Youβre seeing this warning because there has been some unusual activity > from this account. Do you still want to view it?" > > What's going on? > > Mk > > -- > Martin Keegan, @mk270, https://mk.ucant.org/ The original email looks like it was formatted by Petite Abeille and should probably be taken as a trollish provocation.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 1:56 PM David Ashby <delta.mu.alpha@gmail.com> wrote: > The original email looks like it was formatted by Petite Abeille Sure it was! :-) > and should probably be taken as a trollish provocation. I don't think so. Maybe he just implemented what he proposes (it should be highly regarded here!) and opened new channels to get feedback he didn't receive about his earlier proposal on this list. I tried to connect on port 1961 but the connection timed out. Is the server up and running? Maybe my naive request below was wrong? echo -e "text://textprotocol.org\r\n" | nc textprotocol.org 1961 Phil
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 8:36 AM πππ <postmaster@textprotocol.org> wrote: > > https://textprotocol.org > https://textprotocol.org/contact > > βοΈγ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ»γ» All trolling aside, there's a lot of great ideas in here and a very high "power-to-weight" ratio. Thanks for putting this together. I've also been pondering my own version of mercury and I may steal some of this. - Michael
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 2:33 AM Michael Lazar <lazar.michael22@gmail.com> wrote: > > All trolling aside, there's a lot of great ideas in here and a very > high "power-to-weight" ratio. Thanks for putting this together. Did you manage to connect on port 1961?
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:07 PM Phil Leblanc <philanc@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 2:33 AM Michael Lazar <lazar.michael22@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > All trolling aside, there's a lot of great ideas in here and a very > > high "power-to-weight" ratio. Thanks for putting this together. > > Did you manage to connect on port 1961? Implementing a protocol this perfect would only ruin it.
> On Mar 10, 2021, at 22:36, Phil Leblanc <philanc@gmail.com> wrote: > > Maybe my naive request below was wrong? # echo -e 'text://txt.textprotocol.org/\r\n' | nc txt.textprotocol.org 1961 # openssl s_client -quiet -crlf -connect txt.textprotocol.org:1965 <<< text://txt.textprotocol.org/ 2>/dev/null https://github.com/textprotocol/publictext β πππ https://textprotocol.org https://textprotocol.org/contact
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 5:15 PM πππ <postmaster@textprotocol.org> wrote: > > # echo -e 'text://txt.textprotocol.org/\r\n' | nc txt.textprotocol.org 1961 > > # openssl s_client -quiet -crlf -connect txt.textprotocol.org:1965 <<< text://txt.textprotocol.org/ 2>/dev/null > > https://github.com/textprotocol/publictext > Thanks!
---
Previous Thread: [TECH] HtmGem v1.0.0, Php program to view Gemini through HTTP
Next Thread: [users] Gemini as a local note-taking / personal wiki thing?