Re: Apologies for my previous messages

1. The Gnuserland (gnuserland (a) mailbox.org)

If people are not free to express their opinion this would be a real problem.

I am not sure if you misunderstood the situation, but it is cool having an 
opposite opinion if we use a civil communication tone; for instance I 
totally dislike the BDFL concept but I am happy that SolderPunk came back, 
this will help to get to the point quickly.

Something that I observed in the mailing list was the struggling to 
interpret his vision properly, with him once again actively involved in 
the process people can confront directly with him. 

Finalizing the specs quickly will help implementers and capsulers to be on 
the same page, it will be a big benefits for all of us!

My best,

Tgl




>
>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:42:38 +0200
>From: almaember <almaember@disroot.org>
>To: gemini@lists.orbitalfox.eu
>Subject: Apologies for my previous messages
>Message-ID: <57756648-6E58-4044-B8B9-D202EFD260EC@disroot.org>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>Hello again,
>
>I wanted to say that I apologize for my earlier messages and the mess I 
caused. In retrospect, I misunderstood multiple people, including and 
especially Solderpunk.
>
>I understand now that what I said was misguided. As someone has pointed 
out, it's not finalized yet. So the problem I had would only be a problem 
if it had been finalized.
>
>Last, but not least: the community trusts Sp. with this power, and I said 
that the community should decide by this point, then from all perspectives 
he is in control.
>
>In short: sorry for the stupid things I said. But I still believe that 
the best solution would be to freeze the spec as-is.
>
>That's all. Sorry

Link to individual message.

---

Previous Thread: Apologies for my previous messages

Next Thread: SMALL INTERNET PROTOCOL ROUNDUP