2010-10-21 12:15:40
Comic Sans, that unassuming jaunty typeface lurking inside millions of
computers, has become the target of an online hate campaign. Simon Garfield
explains why normally mild-mannered people are so enraged by its use.
How did schools ever advertise their Christmas fairs without it? Has a homemade
birthday card ever looked so friendly written in anything else? Have type
lovers ever found anything they loathe as much?
If you wrote these questions in Comic Sans you'd have something that was warm,
inoffensive and rather unsuitable, a typeface that's gone wrong. And you'd also
have something guaranteed to provoke a howl of protest.
Comic Sans is unique: used the world over, it's a typeface that doesn't really
want to be type. It looks homely and handwritten, something perfect for things
we deem to be fun and liberating. Great for the awnings of toyshops, less good
on news websites or on gravestones and the sides of ambulances.
Last year it stuck out like an unfunny joke in Time magazine and Adidas
adverts, and even the BBC wasn't immune, choosing the font to promote its
Composers of the Year during the Proms.
What can be done? One can buy the "Ban Comic Sans" mugs, caps and T-shirts, and
help finance a documentary called Comic Sans, Or the Most Hated Font In The
World.
Black-tie do (not)
Holly and David Combs, the husband and wife cottage industry behind
bancomicsans.com, argue that the misuse of the font is "analogous to showing up
for a black tie event in a clown costume". Some of what the Combses have to say
is tongue-in-cheek, but it is hard to disagree with their claims that type -
used well or badly - has the ability to express meaning far beyond the basic
words it clothes.
The bunny gets it Bunny boiler - just a taste of the antipathy
But why, more than any other font, has Comic Sans inspired so much revulsion?
Partly because its ubiquity has led to such misuse (or at least to uses far
beyond its original intentions). And partly because it is so irritably simple,
so apparently written by a small child. Helvetica is everywhere and simple too,
but it usually has the air of modern Swiss sophistication about it, or at least
corporate authority. Comic Sans just smirks at you, and begs to be printed in
multiple colours.
Perhaps the most comic thing about Comic Sans is that it was never designed as
a font for common use. It was intended merely as a perfect solution to a small
corporate problem.
It was created in 1994 by Vincent Connare, who worked at Microsoft with the
title of "typographic engineer".
Mrs Gates' role
In 1994, Connare looked at his computer screen and saw something strange. He
was clicking his way through an unreleased trial copy of Microsoft Bob, a
software package designed to be particularly user-friendly. It included a
finance manager and a word processor, and for a time was the responsibility of
Melinda French, who later became Mrs Bill Gates.
Typesetters in the Olden Days Typesetters of old - perhaps unlikely to have
received it warmly
But the typeface it used was Times New Roman, which Connare judged to be a
strange choice. It was a little harsh and schoolmasterly, not to say boring. It
was not something that would hold your hand in a welcoming way.
Connare was a fan of the graphic novel, and was inspired by the speech bubbles
to create something simple and rounded, letters that might have been created by
cutting with blunt scissors (the truth is he used a popular font-making
software package).
His font, not yet called Comic Sans, was rejected for technical reasons (it
didn't fit the existing grids), but not long afterwards was adopted for the
successful Microsoft Movie Maker. It was then included as a supplementary
typeface in the Windows 95 operating system, where everyone with a PC could not
only see it, but use it.
Better than Times New Roman
And thus it became a global phenomenon, something that would inspire attention
from Design Week magazine to the Wall St Journal. Connare later explained why
it worked so well: "'Because it's sometimes better than Times New Roman, that's
why."
Comic Sans' inventor
When Vincent Connare designed Comic Sans he wasn't looking for worldwide
notoriety. He began life as a painter and photographer, but has since
established a reputation as a serious but entertaining graphic communicator.
His other typefaces include Trebuchet and Magpie.
He accepts all the anti-Comic Sans fuss with good grace but, alas, without
royalties (he was a staffer when he made it).
When people ask him at dinner parties what he does, he tells them he designs
type. 'You might have heard of Comic Sans,' he suggests. And everybody says
yes.
One thing the Comic Sans debate has demonstrated beyond doubt is that one's
choice of font is now a serious affair.
Twenty years ago fonts were not something most of us gave much of a second
thought. Unless we were in the print or design industries, fonts were something
we accepted rather than chose.
The pull-down menu on our computers changed everything. Here was a way of
expressing our intentions and emotions in a new way, a choice that stretched
from digital updates of Garamond from the 16th Century up to modern screen
fonts such as Georgia and Calibri.
We could employ the efficient Gill Sans for job applications or the more
elegant Didot for wedding invitations. We could become familiar with the
differences between serif faces and sans serifs, the former with feet and tips
on their letters, the latter usually with a less formal air. And we could
unleash a seemingly harmless childlike new font on a defenceless world.
Almost inevitably, the Comic Sans backlash has produced a backlash of its own.
There are already signs that the font may be becoming retro-chic, in the same
way that we now embrace 80s fashion and pop. Most significant of all, it has
become highly regarded by those who work with dyslexic children - one of the
better uses for which it was never intended.
Simon Garfield wrote this article in Georgia regular. He is the author of Just
My Type: A Book About Fonts, published by Profile Books.
Below is a selection of your comments
It does have a use: rather like Dan Brown books or baseball hats with beercans
attached, it marks the user out as someone to be avoided.
Tim Footman, Bangkok/London
Why must the BBC continue to give this font the oxygen of publicity? Can't we
just let it wither away?
Mark Scott, Basingstoke, UK
The main problem I have with Comic Sans is that it makes everything written in
it look like a parish newsletter pinned to a noticeboard outside the local
church. It also smacks of faux joviality - you can imagine the CEO of some
multinational using it memos to make himself appear approachable. However,
children like it - so perhaps like blunt-edged play scissors its use should be
restricted to the classroom.
Chris Limb, Brighton, UK
There's a great Hitler Downfall video deriding Comic Sans - apparently a new SS
recruiting poster is going to use it. No prizes for guessing the font used for
the subtitles.
Ian, London, UK
As a teacher Comic Sans is an easy to read font, especially for pupils with
learning difficulties as it is the only font to use a 'hand writing style'
letter a.
Louise, W Midlands
When we did brand and identity work for a new special needs high school last
year, we were requested to use a 'dyslexia friendly font, like comic sans.'
Comic sans has appeal to the masses. The communicator has the choice, long may
it be so...
Mark Turner, Mold, UK
Comic Sans takes all the received wisdom flak but the ubiquity of Impact is
just as bad. Making free/system fonts both elegant AND readable for
web-browsing or decorative graphics is still quite a challenge to this day
(only Arial and maybe Georgia really work for me). I'm using Twitter in Chrome
and the default font of Helvetica Neue Condensed renders so badly.
Gabbo, London
I like it. I wouldn't use it in a business e-mail, but it's my choice of font
for less formal conversations in the corporate version of MSN that's used where
I work. I was completely unaware that it was controversial!
S Weekes, Cardiff