What you're doing looks like the next level of mighty! I don't know which one I love more between:
1:
+ _. --- ._ ' . .-'` ``. '-. . . .' `.===-' '='. ' ' + _ _ _ The ____ ( / ) ) . / . / _/_ ( / ) / / / / , __/ ,_ , _, /_ / /--', , / / / (_(_(_/_/ /_(_(_)_/ /_(__ / (_/_/_) /| - Est. 2020 . . (/ .-. ' .-'=. ' ' '.-. `, .'.' * ' -. ___ .- *
And 2:
+ _. --- ._ ' . .-'` ``. '-. . . .' `.===-' '='. ' ___ /_ __ ' + _ _ _ ( / / //=_ _ __ ( / ) ) o / o / _/_ ( / ) / / / / , __/ ,_ , _, /_ / /--', , / / / (_(_(_/_/ /_(_(_)_/ /_(__ / (_/_/_) /| - Est. 2020 . . (/ .-. ' .-'=. ' ' '.-. `, .'.' * ' -. ___ .- *
What do you all think?
I think I'd keep the 'o's on the 'i's, still unsure 'bout the "the" though...
Alternative:
___ /_ __ ( / / //-_
Or:
____ /_ __ ( / / //-__)
But it'll never quite match the FIGlet font:/
Edit:
__/_ /_ _ ( / / / (/_)
Edit:
___ /_ __ / / //-_ __/_ /_ __ / / //-_ ___ /_ _ / / /(/_ __/_ /_ _ / / /(/_
+ _. --- ._ ' . .-'` ``. '-. . . .' `.===-' '='. ' ___ /_ __ ' + _ _ _ / / //-_ _ __ ( / ) ) o / o / _/_ ( / ) / / / / , __/ ,_ , _, /_ / /--', , / / / (_(_(_/_/ /_(_(_)_/ /_(__ / (_/_/_) /| - Est. 2020 . . (/ .-. ' .-'=. ' ' '.-. `, .'.' * ' -. ___ .- *
Dunno, the bracket kinda was the only resemblance to the font...
The first one. I didn't recognize the "the" in the second. Great work!