💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › clseibold › 20934 captured on 2024-12-17 at 15:59:51. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: "Would be good to figure out a system for dealing with..."
@vi Interesting. According to satch's error message, it tries to start up the reverification process, but it is failing to send a new verification message to your server. It could be that somehow @satch's fingerprint got changed from what's in your server's TOFU store, perhaps? I don't think gemalaya's server (if that's what you're using) has a reverification process like my server has, but your server is rejecting the new verification message that @satch's server is sending.
Oct 16 · 2 months ago
@clseibold that gives me some info to work off of, thanks! I'll try again with verbose printing later tonight. I just wrote my server from scratch.
Sorry, things got in the way tonight, gonna do it in the next day or so.
🚀 clseibold · Oct 17 at 07:42:
@vi No problem. I obsessively keep track of the misfin subspace here, so there's no rush.
@vi this is really odd... my server doesn't have any misfin fingerprint stored for you in tofu_store.list.
I'm like 90% sure I figured out the issue. It's "an" issue at least. Fixing it now. This was my fault for not testing Misfin C well enough!
@satch Thanks for bearing with me! I think I have it fixed now!!! I was able to send you a test message without my server crashing.
🚀 clseibold · Oct 18 at 07:43:
@vi I'm glad you got it fixed. If it would help with your implementation, we are working on an updated misfin(C) draft that makes a lot more things explicit:
I intend to finish this up very soon.
@clseibold My issue ended up being assumptions in my code for the CRLF. I initially had the server set up properly for Misfin C, but when adding Gemini and Misfin B support and then removing Titan support before I released 0.0.1, I modified/simplified my code to deal strip out the CRLF and completely forgot Misfin C expects the CRLF before the message.
I fixed it though, so it should be fine. Also added reidentification code like your server does, which "hopefully" should play nice when it eventually is used.
Would be good to figure out a system for dealing with changed client certs, preferably gracefully. I got a message from @satch, but can't respond because I sent a message to them with a previous client cert while trying to test my server initially. I suspect it'll be common for folks who build their own server or client to change their client cert while debugging and testing, even after sending a message to someone. P.S. - @satch, if you could delete my old client cert fingerprint for vi@...