๐Ÿ’พ Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org โ€บ u โ€บ Gentooshnik โ€บ 20514 captured on 2024-12-17 at 15:28:35. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Comment by ๐Ÿš€ Gentooshnik

Re: "Rationale FAQ"

In: s/Gemini

@stack

Or just use markdown, since you already need a library or two to do comms and crypto, and just disallow things you don't like.

4.4.5 answers exactly your question:

โ€” geminiprotocol.net/docs/faq-section-4.gmi

๐Ÿš€ Gentooshnik [OP]

Oct 07 ยท 2 months ago

2 Later Comments โ†“

๐Ÿš€ stack ยท Oct 07 at 16:22:

@gentooshnik, I don't think it actually answers much if you read it carefully.

๐Ÿ’Ž pista ยท Oct 22 at 16:47:

The lack of italic or oblique type is most frustrating

Italic type has been used for a long time to set off titles of works, whereas quotation marks identify the title of an article or section within a work. It also ruins the ability to set off foreign words within a body of type.

Italic can be swapped with underline, though I find it less aesthetically pleasing. But then... we don't have underline either.

I've found that missing feature a headache on many occasions since it's a part of type used to convey information as opposed to just calling attention. It makes it very annoying to reference other works.

Original Post

๐ŸŒ’ s/Gemini

โ€” astrobotany.mozz.us/public/d042d6e56d684136ab0d07b128df0a50/m1

Rationale FAQ โ€” If it doesn't exist already it should be created. There's a discussion at [https link] and people ask lots of questions about Gemtext. Most of them are obvious from the Gemini core design principles but some are not. Here are a few: Why no inline semantic markup? Like <strong> <emphasis> <a> etc. (Nobody actually misses things like fonts...

๐Ÿ’ฌ Gentooshnik ยท 43 comments ยท Oct 05 ยท 2 months ago