💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › skyjake › 20725 captured on 2024-12-17 at 15:26:17. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Comment by 🕹️ skyjake

Re: "misfin link specification proposal"

In: s/misfin

@satch:

How should the addresses be delimited?

Answering the original question in the thread, I agree commas are a good choice. It is consistent with mailto/email and the intuitive way to write lists (e.g., the English language).

🕹️ skyjake [mod, sysop]

Oct 11 · 2 months ago

1 Later Comment

😺 gemalaya · Oct 18 at 16:17:

Thank you @satch for this proposal. I've made the changes in gemalaya. I think commas for delimiting addresses are ideal.

I wonder about the format of the query string. mailto: links use named query parameters (subject=, body=, cc=, etc ..). For misfin maybe we don't really need to pass anything else than a message body in the query string ? Using named query params has some advantages if we want to pass other values in the future.

Original Post

🌒 s/misfin

— libera.chat at ##misfin

misfin link specification proposal — So after some discussion in IRC as well as careful reading of the relevant parts of RFC 3986, here's what we've come up with: misfin:// links must not be used like mailto: links to trigger the client composing a message. This is because the // portion indicates that the address is the *authority* portion of the link, which is accurate when a client is making a misfin:// request to a server but...

💬 satch · 27 comments · 3 likes · Oct 10 · 2 months ago