💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › halscode › 20067 captured on 2024-12-17 at 15:57:38. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Comment by 🚲 halscode

Re: "Did you (@skyjake) consider implenting the "edit" Titan..."

In: s/Lagrange

@vi It could be possible, maybe, to have a secondary "delete" token in addition to the normal "edit" one, in that case. So one password to commit normal edits, the other to confirm dangerous actions? Along with other checks, like you have to also set the body to "delete this" or something.

Or just have the body checked for "delete this". I guess that works too.

My script abuses tokens pretty bad to accomplish what it does (it also has directory listings, renaming, etc). So it's not a case I would expect anything to accommodate.

🚲 halscode

Sep 28 · 3 months ago

Original Post

🌒 s/Lagrange

Did you (@skyjake) consider implenting the "edit" Titan parameter? [gemini link] "edit" extension to Titan spec To summarise that proposal: a successful request "titan://example.org/example;edit" returns data for the user to edit, which is then submitted as a normal Titan request to the same path. I think this would make Titan editing much more usable. Without it, editing text is rather awkward. I don't see how to improve on how Bubble does it -- sending the user to a gemini page with the...

💬 mbays · 9 comments · 2 likes · Jul 13 · 5 months ago