💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › clseibold › 20100 captured on 2024-12-17 at 15:35:37. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Comment by 🚀 clseibold

Re: "If I write a misfin server and a client, which protocol..."

In: s/misfin

@skyjake Yeah, I remember making that decision and debating with myself and with the others on whether we should use a tab or space.

We went with the tab so that a misfin(C) request actively failed on misfin(B) servers, and this allowed clients to determine whether a server was B or C. If it was B, the C request would always fail, then the client could retry with a misfin B request.

I wasn't too sure at the time whether everyone would move over to C or if lem would accept any of the changes we proposed (and lem-two had just announced they came back, only to never login again; I hope they are doing okay).

So I felt it was important that C servers can use B requests, and C clients can fallback to B requests for B servers.

If I had known whether everyone would switch to C or not, I would probably just have used a space, but I didn't want to risk lack of interoperability in case we had a fractured ecosystem.

Anyways, I learned a lot from helping with the C spec. We used this trick and a few others, and this allowed me to realize that we need to use tricks to limit this type of extensibility in protocol specs, lol.

🚀 clseibold

Sep 29 · 3 months ago

Original Post

🌒 s/misfin

If I write a misfin server and a client, which protocol spec should I target? Is there any "known good" implementation I can test interoperability against? Thank you.

💬 dimkr · 2 comments · Sep 06 · 3 months ago