๐Ÿ’พ Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org โ€บ s โ€บ Linux โ€บ 15488 captured on 2024-12-17 at 11:50:41. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

โฌ…๏ธ Previous capture (2024-09-29)

๐Ÿšง View Differences

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

So, I tried to fumble a little with Linux syscalls and tried to implement a program that restarts the computer.

#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/reboot.h>

int main() {
    sync();
    if (reboot(LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_RESTART) < 0)
        write(2, "Failure.\n", 9);
    return 1;
}

After a quick, successful test, I checked how others implement the reboot. To my surprise, busybox tries to send a signal to init instead of using the reboot syscall, like I did. This makes me wonder, why that is.

Posted in: s/Linux

๐Ÿ”ญ DocEdelgas

Mar 05 ยท 9 months ago ยท ๐Ÿ‘ stack

4 Comments โ†“

๐Ÿš‚ MrSVCD ยท 2024-03-05 at 21:01:

Does your program let programs to shut down clearly?

๐Ÿ”ญ DocEdelgas [OP] ยท 2024-03-06 at 00:13:

Not really. Rather, it powers off the system in an instant.

๐Ÿš‚ MrSVCD ยท 2024-03-06 at 08:53:

Ah, init systems are responsible for both bringing up and down your system.

For example letting databases to shut down in a known state so that it can continue with all the data intact. While sync() system call might look like it would do that but if it is at all like sync command it only affects filesystems.

๐Ÿ“ท sjlxndr ยท 2024-03-08 at 01:29:

this is not kill (1) it is more like murder (8) ๐Ÿ˜