💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › jmjl › 20793 captured on 2024-12-17 at 15:14:01. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Comment by 🍭 jmjl

Re: "gopher over TLS (gophers) support"

In: s/Lagrange-Issues

Wouldn't that be checking the presence of a TLSA record?

Also, note that I've detected some clients will try to do tls when you specify gophers:// and prompt you if you want to do it without tls and fallback to non-tls.

🍭 jmjl [OP]

Oct 12 · 2 months ago

2 Later Comments ↓

🦂 zzo38 · Oct 12 at 21:02:

I looked up TLSA record, and I believe that will work. (A browser could have an option, to use TLS for links between Gopher servers according to TLSA records.)

🍭 jmjl [OP] · Oct 16 at 15:31:

I found this whilst browsing gopher:

— Article talking about Secure Gopher

— Proposal about gophers://

Original Post

🌒 s/Lagrange-Issues

I've noticed there's no support for gopher over TLS, so I think it's a good idea to make a issue here for it to be supported. I've been told it's just the same protocol with a layer of TLS on top.

💬 jmjl · 8 comments · Mar 02 · 10 months ago · #feature #gopher