💾 Archived View for gemini.quux.org › h › Government › Israeli%20-%20Palestinian%20War › fafo › repo… captured on 2024-08-31 at 16:57:31.

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2024-08-19)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<html>
<head>
<title>FAFO Report 177</title>

<map name = pager>
<area shape = rect coords = "0,0,464,20" href="index.html">
<area shape = rect coords = "464,0,482,20" href="3_1.html">
<area shape = rect coords = "482,0,496,20" href="index.html">
<area shape = rect coords = "494,0,514,20" href="3_3.html">
</map>
</head>

<body  bgcolor="#ffffff">

<center>

<table width = 528 cols = 1 border = 0 cellpadding = 5>

<tr valign = top>
<td>
<a href="../../../../../../../_._.html"><img src="http://almashriq.hiof.no/sys/almashriq-fafo-page.gif" border = 0 usemap="#pager"></a>
</td>
</tr>

</td>
</tr>

<tr valign = top width=528>
<td>

<H2>The relationship between state and refugee</H2>
Each of the four states, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and Israel, have accorded
its Palestinian refugee-community with diverging sets of rights and duties
vis-&agrave;-vis the state. Residence in different states has thus had crucial
implications for the material and physical well-being of Palestinians because
each state's legal framework directly affects the personal security, economic
opportunities and social situation of refugees. These different state policies
have created a range of Palestinian identities in terms of legal statuses.
Each state has formed administrative authorities which deal with the presence
of Palestinian refugees, some of which are sub-units under either the Foreign
or the Interior Ministries of the respective host-states.<BR>
<BR>
In Jordan, refugee camps are provided by the Jordanian government. All camps
are administered by the Department of Palestinian Affairs which is an independent
department linked to the Prime Minister's Office. The Jordanian Government
is responsible for the administration, security and services in the camps.
UNRWA offers education, health and social welfare services which are subject
to reimbursement from the Jordanian Government. <BR>
<BR>
There has been three main waves of Palestinian mass influx to Jordan. The
first wave of approximately 440,000 refugees is the largest group.11 They
are referred to as the &quot;1948-refugees&quot;, denoting Palestinians
who left their homeland following the 1948-war. Most of the 72,000 residents
in the camp of Wihdat, for instance, are 1948-refugees (UNRWA- Jordan Field
Office, January 1994). <BR>
<BR>
A second wave of refugees was created following the 1967 war when an additional
240,000 Palestinians settled in the East Bank (Guide to UNRWA, April 1994:6).
This wave included both resident West Bank Palestinians, Palestinians from
Gaza, and 1948-refugees who had previously fled following the creation of
the state of Israel. While 1948-refugees retained their legal status as
&quot;Palestine refugees&quot; according to UNRWA's criterias, the new influx
of 1967-refugees (who had not fled in 1948) were to be formally referred
to as &quot;displaced persons&quot; both by UNRWA and the Jordanian state.
Of the approximately 400,000 refugees who fled to Jordan in 1967, 240,000
were first time refugees, while the rest were 1948-refugees. The camp of
Baqa'a which houses approximately 79,000 refugees includes both categories
of refugees whereof 85% are registered as 1948-refugees and the remaining
15% are displaced persons (UNRWA- Jordan Field Office, January 1994). The
1990-Iraqi invasion of Kuwait created the third wave of Palestinian refugees
where approximately 300,000 Palestinians came from Kuwait and the other
Gulf states (Guide to UNRWA, Aril 1994:6). In addition there is a considerable
number of Palestinians who came in between periods of war but were later
barred from returning.<BR>
<BR>
The bulk of Palestinian refugees residing in Jordan are eligible to Jordanian
citizenships which accords them the same civic rights as native East Bank
Jordanians. Having a Jordanian citizenship legally grants Palestinian refugees
the right to move, work, own property, and vote as native Jordanians. Despite
an acquired Jordanian citizenship, 1948-refugees do not lose their UNRWA-defined
status as Palestinian refugees. <BR>
<BR>
When Jordan relinquished its full claims to sovereignty over the West Bank
in 1989, West Bank Palestinians lost their granted right to Jordanian citizenship.
The government, however, still issues so-called &quot;two-year passports&quot;
which differ in legal treatment from &quot;five-year&quot;-passports accorded
to other Jordanians.<BR>
<BR>
Most Palestinians living in Jordan have, in terms of formal legal relationship
to the state, the opportunity to obtain a more secure personal legal position
through their citizenships, than Palestinians living in other states, most
of whom do not have the right to citizenship. Syria, notably, comes nearest
Jordan in granting Palestinians equal civil rights as Syrian citizens, excluding
citizenship and the right to vote. Gaza-refugees do not, however, enjoy
citizenship rights. They are obliged to apply for residence and work permits
as other foreigners, they travel on Egyptian travel documents and must obtain
a return visa before departing from Jordan if they wish to enter the country
again. Some Gazans have &quot;two-year&quot; Jordanian passports due to
personal causes such as marriage with Jordanian citizens. <BR>
<BR>
The formal legal status for Palestinians is becoming more complicated after
Palestinians lost the right to obtain Jordanian citizenships in 1989. In
addition, the fact that Palestinians often move and work all over the Middle
East, may also create problems for their legal status, as the following
example show: <BR>
<BR>
A 19-year-old Palestinian student who works as a waiter has no passport.
He was born in Kuwait where his father, born in Jaffa and raised in the
West bank, had migrated to in 1963. His father, who possessed a Jordanian
citizenship, had recently died, and his mother is not entitled to a citizenship
because she is from Gaza, leaving the young student without formal travel
documents. <BR>
<BR>
Although formally Jordanian, there exists a social cleavage between native
Palestinians (West Bankers) and native Jordanians (East Bankers) which was
clearly brought to surface upon the outbreak of the Black September internal
clashes of 1970 between the two groups. Since 1970, Palestinian political
activity has been a sensitive subject. What was built up of Jordanian-Palestinian
integration created suspicion which still colours the attitudes of many
people. <BR>
<BR>
Several respondents in our fieldwork indicated that they perceived themselves
as being discriminated against in Jordanian society. In the sphere of education,
for instance, the daughter of a surgeon complained that she was not able
to enter the University of Jordan because it operates with a system of geographical
quotas. As she belongs to the very small quota of &quot;Jordanians Abroad&quot;,
which according to her, constitute 6% of the students accepted and where
Palestinians are heavily represented, she was not accepted while Jordanians
with lower marks were enrolled. According to her father, the system is discriminating
as it makes it more difficult for Palestinians from the cities where most
of them live to get enrolled than for citizens in the rural districts who
are predominantly native Jordanians.<BR>
<BR>
What is noteworthy in our context is that Palestinian identity appears to
be closely connected with the degree of political activism in Jordan, whether
activity spans from demonstrations to ideological conviction. Equal treatment
before the law among East and West Bankers in society is perceived by Palestinians
(West Bankers) to be insufficient when it comes to bolster and emphasise
their identity as Palestinians. As long as Palestinian activism is perceived
as threatening by the host state, Palestinians are bound to perceive that
their persecution and alleged discrimination is closely linked with their
identity as Palestinians.<BR>
<BR>
In Lebanon, the Directorate General of Palestinian Refugee Affairs (DPRA)
within the Ministry of Interior is responsible for the Palestinian presence
in the country where approximately 350,000 Palestinians reside. The exact
number of Palestinians, however, is unknown because the figure includes
a certain number of Lebanese and excludes a number of Palestinians. These
are the descendants of some 160,000 refugees who arrived in 1948 and an
additional 5,000 who arrived in the aftermath of 1967-war with Israel and
the 1970-Black September clashes in Jordan. UNRWA-data indicate that 334,659
Palestinians are UNRWA-registered (Guide to UNRWA, April 1994:7). The rest
is either registered at the DPRA or are residing illegally in the country.<BR>
<BR>
Palestinians are assumed to constitute approximately 8-10% of the Lebanese
population12. They are perceived by the government as a heavy political
burden on the already fragile sectarian political system which collapsed
during the 14-year long civil war. Prior to and during the civil war, the
Palestinian cause was endorsed by several Moslem and leftist political groupings
to the disagreement of the Christian political elite. A clear policy regulating
the rights and duties of Palestinian refugees in the country has been more
or less absent. Palestinians did not have official statements regulating
their presence in the country before the Cairo Accords were concluded in
November 1969 whereby Lebanese-PLO relations were settled.13 The Accords
were unilaterally abrogated by the Lebanese government in June 1987, leaving
the Palestinian refugee community in Lebanon in a politically uncertain
situation. The official ambiguity regarding the Palestinian presence is
clearly reflected in the handling of the legal residence of refugees in
the country.<BR>
<BR>
The Lebanese authorities have issued four decrees relating to the Palestinian
presence in Lebanon; one which established the DPRA, another determined
its powers, the third installed a special Lebanese security force for the
Palestinian camps, while the fourth authorised the establishment of a camp
(Alnatour 1993:42).14 Neither the Cairo Accords nor these decrees address
the relationship between the refugees and their host country within a legal
framework clarifying individual rights and obligations. <BR>
<BR>
As a collective body, Palestinians are accorded residency rights in Lebanon
within the context of decree no. 319 of August 2, 1962 where Palestinians
are specified as &quot;(f)oreigners not holding documents from their original
countries and residing in Lebanon&quot;. This article urged Palestinians
to settle their status and obtain temporary or permanent residential permits
(Alnatour 1993:42). After 1975, however, the granting of identity cards
and travel documents was made conditional on the presentation of UNRWA ration
cards. Refugees not registered at UNRWA, including the 1967-refugees, are
estimated to encompass 50,000 refugees.15 Other estimates state the number
of unregistered (illegal and those carrying residency permits) at around
100,000 persons.<BR>
<BR>
The 14-year long Lebanese civil war partly explains the uncertainty regarding
the exact number of Palestinians in the country where unknown numbers had
their residency permits confiscated or stamped &quot;not allowed to return&quot;
in the early 1980s. The Lebanese authorities also took off the register
Palestinians entitled to stay in Lebanon if they acquired residency or other
citizenship abroad.<BR>
<BR>
The conditional connection made by the Ministry of Interior between residency
permits and UNRWA cards jeopardizes the security of residence of all Palestinians
not registered by UNRWA, and enhances the legal vulnerability of unregistered
refugees in Lebanon. The danger of the conditional connection between residency
and the UNRWA card has come to surface in 1993, when the Agency issued new
computerised ID-cards and set a one-year deadline for the registered to
meet personally. Since large numbers of legally registered are outside the
country for motives of work, study and residency, this practice might lead
to the annulment of the residency permits for an unknown number of Palestinian
refugees, who thus are denied the right to come back and stay in Lebanon,
their original country of residence (Alnatour 1993:42). Following these
rules, approximately 25% of all Palestinians residing in Lebanon currently
face severe restrictions on their residence security.<BR>
<BR>
During our fieldwork, we encountered several examples of households that
have had difficulties in issuing entry-visas for family-members who had
migrated during the civil war. <BR>
<BR>
Umm Dib in the camp of Rashidiyya in Lebanon tells that as a result of Israel's
establishment of the security zone in the south of Lebanon, she has no problems
visiting her brothers in Israel where she has been four times after she
fled in 1948. She and her son Sari, however, had to work for one month in
order to get an entry visa for her son Dib, who was born and raised in Lebanon,
when he wished to visit his family last year. He currently lives and works
in Germany where he has been staying the past ten years. What complicated
Dib's application was that his Palestinian passport, issued by the DPRA,
had expired, and the officials were suspicious of his intentions to come
back. &quot;Sari and me had to go to an attorney (kateb 'adl), and then
appeal to the court (mahkama) in order to issue an entry permit which enabled
Ziad to visit us for a month&quot;, recalls Umm Dib.<BR>
<BR>
Refugees face formal labour restrictions since they rarely obtain work permits;
the number of permits given to Palestinians since 1948 do not exceed 2,500
permits (Alnatour 1993:43). As a result, Lebanese labour laws have pressed
Palestinian labour into the &quot;informal sector&quot;. Furthermore, Palestinians
are barred from working in government and foreign companies and institutions,
and can only practice as doctors, lawyers, engineers and other &quot;free
professions&quot; by joining syndicates, conditional on Lebanese nationality
(Sayigh 1994a: 24).<BR>
<BR>
Palestinians recall stories whereby members of their families were killed
on check-points during the civil war because they produced Palestinian ID-cards.
Some Palestinians who were dependent on finding work in other places than
their places of residence bought forged Lebanese ID-cards during the civil
war in order to enhance their personal security when they moved around.
Mazen from the camp of Rashidiyya recalls that his father, a day-labourer
who used to seek work on construction sites, issued a forged ID card in
1982 at the price of 100 Lira. He had to go to Beirut to find work at a
time when Palestinians were not allowed to enter the city.<BR>
<BR>
The sectarian system in Lebanon has, on the other hand, alleviated the security
and living condition of Christian Palestinians since most of them obtained
Lebanese citizenships, a step which strengthened the Christian character
of the state and empowered the country's Christian political elite. Middle-class
Moslem Palestinians were also able to obtain citizenships through wasta
until the mid-sixties. The Christian Palestinians, are however, a small
minority of the Palestinians, and the vast majority of Moslem Palestinians
did not get the same access to Lebanese nationality and have been dependent
upon the issuing and re-issuing of vital documents to legitimate their existence
in their country of residence. <BR>
<BR>
Having a Lebanese citizenship grants Palestinians a range of rights of which
the most important is the right to stay in their country of residence. A
citizenship thus eliminates the danger of insecure residency in Lebanon.
It also provides a person with certain rights that guards him or her from
arbitrary legal treatment before the law, and strengthens a person's security
of physical mobility in the country of residence. A citizenship also entails
a range of social and economic advantages such as the right to enter public
secondary schools, lower tax-fees for the purchase of property, and the
non-dependency on work-permits. A citizenship may also be regarded as one
of the strongest indicators and bases for assimilation or incorporation
in a country, and can be instrumental in diminishing the formal legal unequal
treatment between citizens and non-citizens in a country.<BR>
<BR>
During our fieldwork, the issue of granting citizenship to some groups of
Palestinian refugees was widely debated in the Lebanese media. Although
the vast majority of Palestinians residing in Lebanon are not affected,
some are. An unknown number currently registered as refugees are, according
to the new citizenship directives issued in June 1993, eligible to a Lebanese
citizenship. These directives affect two categories of Palestinians; a)
inhabitants of the so-called &quot;Seven Villages&quot; which are situated
on the southern Lebanese boarder currently under Israeli control, and b)
the offspring of Lebanese women married to Palestinians. <BR>
<BR>
The predominantly Shiite inhabitants of the &quot;Seven Villages&quot; have
since Lebanon's independence in 1943 been regarded as &quot;inhabitants
under probe&quot;, not eligible to a citizenship, a state policy which aimed
at preserving the sectarian balance within the Lebanese population. Palestinians
who come from, or have fled from these villages are now able to get a Lebanese
citizenship. Likewise, the offspring of Lebanese women married to Palestinians
are now able to apply for Lebanese citizenships. Previously, citizenship
was granted to offspring in mix-marriages only if the father was Lebanese.
<BR>
<BR>
The granting of Lebanese citizenship to some Palestinians can be considered
a strong incorporating factor in Lebanese society which may influence future
decisions of those affected concerning migration to a Palestinian homeland.
Salah Salah, member of the PLO's Local Council in Lebanon (al-majlis al-markazi),
and leader of the &quot;Returnees Committee&quot; (lajnat al-'aidin) has
criticised the policy of granting Palestinians a Lebanese citizenship &quot;in
order to solve the problem of Palestinian refugees in Lebanon&quot; (al-Wasat,
July 18, 1994:60). According to him, this issue should be postponed to the
beginning of the third year of the &quot;Oslo-Agreement&quot;; Palestinians
should be granted civil rights as in Jordan and Syria, but not the right
to citizenship, retaining thereby their refugee status (ibid:61).<BR>
<BR>
The case of the children of Sana, a Lebanese Shiite married to a Palestinian
in Rashidiyya, illustrates some aspects of the complex issue of citizenship
and national identity which comes to surface when Palestinians have the
opportunity to apply for Lebanese citizenship:<BR>
<BR>
Sana (b. 1950) carries a Lebanese and a Palestinian ID-card after marrying
a Palestinian. She has been head of household since her husband Mohammed,
who worked as a taxi driver, was killed in 1984 by an unknown militia while
Israel controlled the area of Tyre. She has 6 children between the age of
21 and 11, her eldest son Rami was 11 when she became a widow. She is financially
supported by a Palestinian organisation which sponsors widows, and an Islamic
Gulf charity organisation. In addition, her Palestinian father-in-law has
been generous with her and his grandchildren. In 1993 he bought the land
on which Sana's house is erected for the sum of 1 million Lira (approximately
600 USD in 1994-currency). She applied for UNRWA-help in order to enlarge
or rebuild the original two-room zinko roofed dwelling but did not get a
positive answer. Her father-in-law therefore stepped in and helped her financially
in building the new two-room dwelling beside the old UNRWA-dwelling. &quot;He
is generous with his grandchildren, although he himself has been a day-labourer
in the fields all his life. Now that all his children have their own houses,
he has extra money for us&quot;.<BR>
Her husband's kin are keen at knowing whether Sana will apply for Lebanese
citizenships for the children following the new regulations that grant the
descendants of Lebanese mothers citizenships regardless of their father's
nationality. She had assured them that she would follow her husband's kin:
wherever they moved, she would move; she would not go anywhere without them.
&quot;Besides, the citizenship cost too much, up to 1 million Lira (600
USD) per person, I cannot afford this sum for each of my children!&quot;.16
Sana stresses that she feels Palestinian because she has suffered like the
rest of the camp under the atrocities of the Amal-militia, and because her
children consider themselves to be Palestinian. She is indebted to her husband's
family who has helped her in building her current home and has strong incentives
of following her husband's family although she has the right to stay in
Lebanon.<BR>
<BR>
Clearly, Sana and her children have gained new formal legal rights in Lebanon
which may ease and bolster her own and her children's future formal right
of residence in the country following the new citizenship regulations. At
the same time she is well-integrated as a member in her husband's Palestinian
family. It is her husband's extended family which offer the most important
and significant financial resources, and not her Lebanese family. Although
she has lived in a Lebanese village before marrying her Palestinian husband,
she prefers living in the camp beside her husband's kin. Sana capitalises
on her physical closeness to them. She knows they can step in, both financially
and socially, whenever she is in need. Her eldest two children have both
got jobs through friends of her husband's kin; Rami is part of a working-group
together with other Palestinian day-labourers and has a good relationship
with his foreman who provides regular work and thereby grants Rami a regular
income. Sana's other son works as an apprentice at the shop of a Palestinian
electrician who knew his father. <BR>
<BR>
At the same time, it might prove profitable to apply for citizenships in
the future if Sana or her children are prevented from achieving certain
objectives, whether financial or related to security matters. She might
conclude that applying for a citizenship might increase her assets in the
long-run without necessarily impairing her position among her in-laws, and
thus loosing the benefits of living among them.<BR>
<BR>
Another Palestinian living in Lebanon is Abu Fadi whose legal status is
a registered 1948-refugee. He comes from one of the Seven Villages, entitling
him and his family to apply for Lebanese citizenships. &quot;A disgrace
to our identity&quot;, comments Abu Fadi, &quot;I would not allow it. Those
who do it are poor Palestinians who think that the Lebanese government will
help them with something. They are traitors.&quot; He insists on calling
the new regulations as a &quot;plot of nationalisation&quot;, and is ardently
against granting Palestinians living in Lebanon the right to a Lebanese
nationality. Abu Fadi has seemingly strong political reasons for not applying
for a Lebanese citizenship. He has been a PLO-fighter all his life, and
has a military rank although he currently has a civil job as leader of the
popular committee in a squatter area. He is more eager to see what the peace
process might result in. He believes he might get a job in a Palestinian
homeland. &quot;My rifle has been my identity for so long. Let's see what
Holst's identity might bring us&quot;, he says, referring to the late Norwegian
Minister of Foreign Affairs.<BR>
<BR>
The West Bank is inhabited by 1,2 million17 Palestinians, of whom 39% are
registered refugees. Palestinians in the West Bank were under Jordanian
rule between 1948 and 1967 following Jordan's annexation in 1950. Since
1967 the West Bank has been occupied by Israel along with the Gaza strip.
Since the signing of the DoP in September 1993, negotiations have been under
way between Israel and the PLO concerning the establishment of autonomous
rule under Palestinian leadership. In August 1994, the administration of
schools was transferred to Palestinian bodies. Negotiations are still ongoing
regarding the further implementation of Declaration of Principles. <BR>
<BR>
In the following some formal regulations and laws concerning the legal rights,
obligations and obstacles which Palestinians have been subjugated to since
1967 are outlined. The elaboration is meant to illustrate the legal conditions
which have formed the framework of the Palestinian sphere of action and
the resulting coping strategies in the West Bank during the past 25 years.<BR>
<BR>
The legal basis for the operation of the administrative and judicial systems
in the West Bank under Israeli occupation is a proclamation issued on June
7, 1967 which declares that the commander of the Israeli Defence Forces
(IDF) on the West Bank assumed &quot;any power of government, legislation,
appointive or administrative&quot; (Benvenisti 1986:143). The administration
of the West Bank is thus under the control of the Military Government (MG)
which is directly responsible to the Minister of Defence. The MG carries
out both security and civilian tasks. Although the Civilian Administration
(CA) was established in 1981, civilian matters remained completely subordinate
to the MG (ibid:145). <BR>
<BR>
The rule in the West Bank has been a rule by decrees where Security Enactments
and Military Orders covered all aspects of daily life.18 Until 1986 there
has been approximately 15,000 orders and amendments issued covering the
spheres of agriculture, commerce, education, health, censorship, security,
land, public order, traffic and taxes (Benvenisti 1986:196). West Bankers
were controlled through the Israeli issuing of ID-cards, travel permits,
work-permits, driving licences, and licences for professional practices
(Heiberg &amp; &Oslash;vensen 1993:27). The issuing of &quot;red&quot; and
&quot;green&quot; ID-cards by the Israelis, whereby previously detained
persons receive green ID-cards while non-detained persons have red ID-cards
illustrates how Palestinians were formally differentiated under military
rule. All Palestinians have to apply for permits to cross the border into
Israel. Those holding green ID-cards are easily sealed out and are not granted
an entry-permit, and even a red-card does not guarantee a seeker to obtain
an entry-permit. Applicants under 25 years did not generally obtain entry-permits
into Israel. Many, however, enter Israel illegally when the borders are
closed because more job-opportunities are available in Israel than in the
West Bank. Israeli authorities control the border and thereby the labour-migration
between the West Bank and Israel, and decide the number of entries granted.
On 4 April 1993, for instance, Israeli authorities allowed the entrance
of 1,200 Palestinians into Israel to perform emergency farm work despite
a border closure. A week later, an additional 7,000 Palestinians were allowed
into Israel (Middle East Journal, Summer 1993). The Israeli Labour Ministry
has thus direct influence on the number of Palestinians that are allowed
to enter the Israeli labour market at any time.<BR>
<BR>
West Bankers have been exposed to detainment without trial because the military
commander has the authority to detain a person perceived as a security threat
without bringing him to trial, on the grounds that trial would endanger
the &quot;security of the region&quot;. A detention order could be issued
for a six-month period and may be renewed indefinitely. Until 1987, the
total number of administrative detainees reached approximately 20,000 (Pelleg
1993:51).<BR>
<BR>
In a household in Askar, four out of five sons were detained and received
green ID-cards during the intifada following participation in demonstrations
and the throwing of stones. Jamil (b. 1971) was detained and imprisoned
four times: three months 1987, one month 1988, 15 days in 1989 and for a
whole year in 1990. In 1988 he was shot in the stomach.. His brothers Ziad
(b. 1965) was detained for two months, and had a green ID-card throughout
the intifada, just as the third brother, Hussein (b. 1968). Hussein entered
Israel illegally in search of work and got a job through a friend, but was
arrested soon after he started working. He received a 200 JD fine and stayed
for a month in jail. After going out of jail, he went back working in Israel
on a construction site. The fourth brother, Nizar (b. 1972) was detained
six months in 1988 and another six months in 1989. He also carried a green
ID-card throughout the intifada. Following the Madrid Conference in October
1991, all four brothers regained their red ID- cards.<BR>
<BR>
Constraints against personal security in the camp have prevented many Palestinians
from a regular school-career or participation in the labour market.<BR>
<BR>
Despite military rule, the occupation has opened up for a labour market
which offers higher wages than those Palestinians are able to receive in
their own labour-market. <BR>
<BR>
Jamal is a refugee from the camp of Askar. He works on a construction site
in Israel. Jamal told his colleague that he would like to marry a Palestinian
girl living in Israel, that is a Palestinian with Israeli citizenship who
has a formal status as an Israeli Arab. His colleague who himself is an
Israeli citizen, introduced the idea of Jamal marrying his niece. The couple
is now engaged. Jamal admits that marriage with a non-refugee Palestinian
girl with Israeli nationality is very costly. One reason is that her family
requires a higher standard of living than refugee girls raised up in the
camps demand, a desire which entails large bride-wealth transaction; The
Arab Israeli girl's family require 3,000 JD (4,800 USD) instead of the regular
1,500 JD (2,400 USD) as a transaction for the girl's marriage. Jamal's family
backs him up financially. Jamal explains that his family thinks of the future.
It is a good investment for a refugee family to marry into a non-refugee
family of Arab-Israeli background, a step which would eventually grant the
refugee-fiancee an Israeli ID-card. The refugee family concludes that the
household as a collective increases its assets as a result of marriage with
a non-refugee. It is useful to have a member who has an Israeli ID-card
since regular labour and income in Israel is thus granted.<BR>

<h5>11.) The precise number of Palestinian refugees who settled in the
West and East Bank following the 1948 war is unknown. The number 440,000 is
based on estimates provided by Brand 1988. She estimates the West Bank
refugee population to amount to 280,000 registered refugees. (ibid:) and
another 160,000 refugees who did not qualify for UNRWA assistance (ibid:148)<br>
12.) The exact number of Lebanese who live in Lebanon is unknown. According
to official 1971-estimates the Lebanese population includes 2,13 million
inhabitants, excluding the Palestinian population. UN mid-year population data
from 1991 estimates the Lebanese population at 2,75 million(The Middle East &
North Africa 1994:626)<br>
13.) The Cairo Accords are also known as the Cairo Agreement. The Accords
were never published or ratified by the Lebanese National Assembly(Sayigh
1994a:33)<br>
14.) Suheil Alnatour is a Palestinian from Lebanon. He is trained as a
lawyer an has done extensive research on the refugee situation, particularly
the civil and legal rights of Palestinians in Lebanon. Alnatour is a writer
and journalist. He is Director of the office of the monthly Arab Le Monde
Diplomatique in Beirut.<br>
15.) World Refugee Survey, U.S Committee for refugees, 1993:108<br>
16.) At the time (July 1994) the debate in the parliament was still going
on concerning the fees for the Lebanese citizenship. While some
representatives suggested that the fee be 1 million Lira(600 USD/4200 NOK),
others suggested that it should be only 25,000 (15 USD/105NOK) arguing
that a citizenship is not bougth but granted. The Government proposed a fee
of 50,000 Lira for persons over the age of 18 and 25,000 Lira for those
under(Assafir, July 20, 1994)<br>
17.) The figure is based on the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS)
which estimates that the de facto population, i.e. the population present
at the time of the census excluding those who are outside the territory for
whatever reason, of the West Bank is 1,052,000(World Bank, September 1993:5
and CBS 1993:758).In addition, the now-Jewish population of Jerusalem which
is estimated at 155,500 is included(CBS 1993:74).<br>
18.) Jordanian laws regulating personal legal affairs, some of which are
based on Islamic codes of law(Shari'a), continued to be in effect
following the Israeli occupation in 1967.<br>
</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align = center>

<a href="_._.html"><img src="../../../../../../../sys/almashriq-bottom-line.gif"alt = "----------------" border= 0></a><p><pre>
<a href="../../../../../../../base/mailpage.html">al@mashriq</a>                       960428/960613</pre>

</table>

</center>

</body>
</html>