💾 Archived View for gemini.quux.org › h › Government › Israeli%20-%20Palestinian%20War › fafo › repo… captured on 2024-08-31 at 16:21:11.

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2024-08-19)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<html>
<head>
<title>FAFO Report 151</title>

<map name = pager>
<area shape = rect coords = "0,0,464,20" href="index.html">
<area shape = rect coords = "464,0,482,20" href="9_4.html">
<area shape = rect coords = "482,0,496,20" href="index.html">
<area shape = rect coords = "494,0,514,20" href="9_6.html">
</map>
</head>

<body  bgcolor="#ffffff">

<center>

<table width = 528 cols = 1 border = 0 cellpadding = 5>

<tr valign = top>
<td>
<a href="../../../../../../../_._.html"><img src="http://almashriq.hiof.no/sys/almashriq-fafo-page.gif" border = 0 usemap="#pager"></a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign = top width=528>
<td>

<H2>Political Attitudes</H2>
Because political attitudes are exceedingly sensitive in the occupied territories,
the survey did not attempt to poll Palestinian political affiliations. It
was thought that any endeavour to do so would prejudice the survey as a
whole by suggesting a political motivation behind the study. However, because
of the political complexity of the region, Palestinians have been subject
to a range of disparate, at times conflicting, ideologies and claims to
loyalty, some of which have long historical precedents, others which are
of more recent origins and all of which are competing for a constituency
in order to help shape the future contours of Palestinian society. Therefore,
the survey did try to assess the effects of the political forces that are
contending in the region to gain individual political sympathies and shape
identities.
<p>

<i>Figure 9.12 What is the main attribute you wish to see in a future palestinian state political preferences by gender</i><br>

<img src="bilder/912.gif">

<P>
The survey contained three explicitly political questions. The first tried
to determine broad political preferences. The question posed a range of
alternative attributes - Arabism, Islam, democracy and socialism - and asked
the respondent to select the one attribute he or she though most important
in a future Palestinian state. The second question listed a range of countries
representing different political systems and asked the respondent to choose
the model he or she felt best suited for Palestine. The question aimed not
only at determining political sympathies, but also at examining the familiarity
that Palestinians had of the outside world and the political options it
contained. The final question tried to explore the boundaries of ultimate
political loyalty and the primary determinant of identity. Here the respondent
was requested to choose one cause for which he or she was willing to make
the ultimate sacrifice. The choices ranged from the family, the Palestinian
people, the Arab nation to the Islamic nation.
<p>

<i>Figure 9.13 Men's political preferences by age groups</i><br>

<img src="bilder/913.gif">

<P>
In assessing Palestinian political values the data suggests that Islam is
by far the single most important attribute valued by Palestinians. Islam
is the majority response of all Palestinians regardless of age, gender,
education, locality of residence, refugee status and socio-economic position.
<p>

<i>Figure 9.14 Women's political preferences by age groups</i><br>

<img src="bilder/914.gif">

<P>
Support for the more traditional ideology of Arab nationalism is relatively
weak among Palestinians although it enjoys the support of 9% of the population.
However, support for notions of socialism, a current of thought which during
the late 1960s and early 70s had a certain constituency in the Middle East,
is almost non-existent. Most notable is the finding that support for Islam
is some three times stronger than support for democracy, with Islam more
strongly represented among women and democracy more strongly represented
among men.
<p>

<i>Figure 9.15 Political preferences by educational level, for men</i><br>

<img src="bilder/915.gif">

<P>
With regard to Islam's support among women, two aspects need to be mentioned.
First, Islam can be understood in at least two different ways. It can be
understood as a religious belief and practice, primarily a matter of scripture.
It can also be understood as a political framework, primarily a matter of
law, government and society. Survey results suggest that women tend to see
Islam more in terms of religious orthodoxy than of political activism. Second,
in comparison to men, women seem less politicised and consequently their
understanding of various political options tends to be more restricted.
Therefore, there are indications that to some extent women overwhelmingly
have chosen Islam because this is the attribute with which they are most
familiar.
<p>

<i>Figure 9.16 Political preferences by educational level, for women</i><br>

<img src="bilder/916.gif">

<P>
When political preferences are broken down by age groups, the data indicates
that majority preference for Islam goes through all age categories, but
that there is a very marked resurgence of Islamic sentiment among the youngest
age group of men. Reversely, for both men and women in this age group, there
has been a sharp decline in democratic attachments.

<P>
When the impact of education on political preferences are examined,	the
data suggests that education serves more than any thing else to strengthen
democratic preferences.

<P>
Two trends are noticeable. First, with increased education, the value placed
on Islam seems to decrease. However, while support for Islam might be less,
survey results also indicate that it is probable that the definition of
Islam shifts under the educational process from primarily a religious belief
to more of an activist political creed. Second, support for democracy is
three times more frequent among those with the highest education than among
those with the least, confirming the trend not only toward secularisation,
but also toward acceptance of plurality and tolerance as mentioned in a
previous chapter.

<P>
If examined together, the data indicates that education is a strong promoter
of democratic values. The steep decline in such values among the youngest
age group of Palestinian men and the abrupt shift to Islamic preferences
could be one effect of the prolonged disruption of education for this age
group during the intifada.

<P>
Socio-economic position also seems to affect political values. The upper
one third of Palestinian society express more sympathy for Arabism (12%
versus 6% for the bottom third), relatively less for Islam and relatively
more for democracy. Particularly among women, the trend toward increasing
preference for democracy with increasing prosperity is marked. Islamic preferences
are again more associated with the middle economic strata of Palestinian
society, a point which will be returned to shortly.

<P>
Whether or not the household has refugee or non-refugee status seems to
have no effect on political values except that non-refugees lean somewhat
more toward Arabism (11% of non-refugee versus 7% of UNRWA refugees).

<P>
The distribution of political values between different types of localities
presents a very intricate picture although in every locality gender differentials
are apparent. Figure 9.17 lists the types of localities that are most associated
and those that are least associated with the various political preferences
examined. Within the localities not listed, preferences are broadly distributed
in a manner more or less representative of the Palestinian population generally.
Because of the disparities between men's and women's preferences, the list
has been broken down by gender.
<p>

<i>Figure 9.17 Localities most associated and least associated with specific political preferences</i><br>

<table border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=5>

<tr align=center><td align=left colspan=5>Men</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left></td><td colspan=2>Most associated</td><td colspan=2>Least associated</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Arabism</td><td>West Bank villages</td><td>14</td><td rowspan=2 valign=top>Gaza camps</td><td rowspan=2 valign=top>4</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left></td><td>Gaza towns/villages</td><td>12</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Islam</td><td>West Bank camps</td><td>70</td><td>Gaza towns/villages</td><td> 48</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left></td><td>West Bank towns</td><td>63</td><td>Gaza camps</td><td> 53</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Democracy</td><td>Gaza camps</td><td>31</td><td rowspan=2 valign=top>Gaza towns</td><td rowspan=2 valign=top>20</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left></td><td>West Bank camps</td><td>21</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Socialism</td><td>Gaza camps</td><td>5</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Don't know</td><td>Gaza town</td><td>17</td><td rowspan=2 valign=top>West Bank towns</td><td rowspan=2 valign=top>2</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left></td><td>Arab Jerusalem</td><td>12</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left colspan=5>Women</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left></td><td colspan=2>Most associated</td><td colspan=2>Least associated</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Arabism</td><td>Gaza camps</td><td>16</td><td rowspan=2 valign=top>Gaza camps</td><td rowspan=2 valign=top>5</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left></td><td>West Bank villages</td><td>12</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Islam</td><td>Greater Gaza City</td><td>70</td><td>Arab Jerusalem</td><td>51</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Democracy</td><td>Gaza camps</td><td>23</td><td rowspan=2 valign=top>West Bank towns</td><td rowspan=2 valign=top>10</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left></td><td>Arab Jerusalem</td><td>22</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Socialism</td><td>West Bank towns</td><td>3</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Don't know</td><td>Gaza towns</td><td>14</td><td rowspan=2 valign=top>Gaza camps</td><td rowspan=2 valign=top>4</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left></td><td>Arab Jerusalem</td><td>14</td></tr>

</table>

<P>
Figure 9.17 again indicates that Islamic preferences are not particularly
associated with Gaza, but more with the West Bank. Surprisingly perhaps,
Gaza male camp residents appear more similar in political values to men
in Arab Jerusalem than to men in the West Bank.

<P>
A previous study has suggested a relationship between arrest records of
household members, used as an indirect measurement of political activism,
and the political attitudes of household members.<a href="9_notes.html#4"><sup>4</sup></a> This survey found no
such correlation with reference to political values.

<P>
Do Palestinians find inspiration in the political systems of other countries
and do their political values lead them to look to other countries for confirmation
of these values? The survey provided respondents with seven different models
together with the optional category of &quot;none of the above&quot;.<BR>
With this sort of question the expectation is usually that &quot;none of
the above&quot; will score very high. Political reality can rarely compete
with the idealized. For the vast majority of Palestinians no country seems
to provide a model. The preference of those who have any seem more based
on familiarity than on ideological propensities. However, when specific
choices are made, they mirror to some extent the political affinities of
Palestinians as measured by political values. Of the men who stated Islam
as the most important attribute in a future Palestinian state, 74% claim
&quot;none of the above&quot; as model, 13% Jordan, and 7% Iran. Among women,
17% choose Jordan, 7% Saudi Arabia and 2% Iran. For respondents who state
democracy, their preferences in declining order are 61% &quot;none of the
above&quot;, 14% France, 11% Jordan, 6% USA, and 5% Cuba. The wealthiest
top third of the Palestinian population has a slightly higher preference
for France (7% versus 3% of lowest third). The only variations in the general
pattern seem to relate to educational levels. While 15% of the most educated
group prefer France (compared to 5% of the general population), only 5%
prefer Jordan (compared with 13% of the general population). Nonetheless,
even among this group a full 67% answer &quot;none of the above&quot;.
<p>
<i>Table 9.9 Which of the following countries is the most suitable model for a future Palestinian state by gender</i><br>

<table border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=5>

<tr align=center><td align=left></td><td>Men</td><td>Women</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>France</td><td>6</td><td>3</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Cuba</td><td>4</td><td>1</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Iran</td><td>4</td><td>2</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>USA</td><td>3</td><td>4</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Saudi Arabia</td><td>1</td><td>5</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Jordan</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Libya</td><td>1</td><td>2</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>None of these</td><td>68</td><td>68</td></tr>

</table>

<P>
The final question relates to a more fundamental pillar of political life.
It involves the boundaries of ultimate loyalty and the definition of political
identity. Nationalism is premised on the imperative that cultural (national)
boundaries and political boundaries should coincide. A corollary of this
premise is that the individual owes his strongest loyalty to the nation
and that his political identity is principally shaped by his nationality.
The nationalist doctrine insists that both local loyalties and those that
transcend national boundaries should be subordinated to the nationalist
imperative.

<P>
In the Middle East the ethnic nationalist message has never had the precision
as it has had in its western home of origins where for at least the last
150 years it has operated to replace empires with states claiming to be
nationally based. In the Middle East local and family loyalties have remained
strong and, partly because of a shared language and religion which transcend
state and even regional borders, the definition of a common identity has
had to deal with many contending meanings. The Arabic language reserves
the word for nation - umma - for the Arabic and Islamic nation solely. Syrians,
Palestinians, Lebanese and so forth refer to themselves generically as peoples
- sha'b - rather than nations. Thus the question aimed at mapping the levels
of ultimate loyalty among Palestinians and relating this map to the pattern
of political values described previously.
<p>

<i>Figure 9.18 For whom would you be willing to make the ultimate sacrifice? Political loyalties by gender</i><br>

<img src="bilder/918.gif">

<P>
The answers reveal that family loyalties, particularly among women, are
still an exceedingly vigorous source of identification. Not unexpectedly
perhaps in light of Palestinian history, attachment to the concept of Arab
nationalism which has been a prime mover, especially in the Fertile Crescent,
for most of the century and is still ardently advocated by key Arab leaders,
is conspicuously weak among Palestinians. The 9% support of Arabism as a
prime political preference does not translate into a political constituency
for Arab nationalism. Instead, adherence to this allegiance seems to have
been replaced, first and foremost, by loyalty to the Palestinian cause.
Especially among men, attachment to emerging forms of Islamic identity is
very notable. The distribution of family loyalties and loyalties to Palestine
and Islam for men are examined by type of locality, and presented in Figure
9.19.
<p>

<i>Figure 9.19 Men¹s ultimate loyalties by type of locality</i><br>

<img src="bilder/919.gif">

<P>
The figures indicate that local family loyalties remain strongest in Arab
Jerusalem and Gaza Town and weakest in the Gaza refugee camps. The low correlation
with the Gaza camps may reflect the extent to which wider family units have
been splintered and the subsequent penetration of more explicitly politically
defined sentiments, especially Palestinian nationalism. However, again the
figures show that Islamic militancy is not particularly associated with
Gaza. The figure would suggest that such militancy is more developed in
the refugee camps of the West Bank.

<P>
If these loyalties are examined in relation to age, the picture that emerges
confirms trends seen elsewhere in this chapter (Figure 9.20).
<p>

<i>Figure 9.20 Ultimate political loyalties by age groups</i><br>

<img src="bilder/920.gif">

<P>
The young express less attachment than the middle-aged to family bonds and
more attachment to bonds that are ideologically delineated. The increase
in identification among young women with Palestinian nationalism is particularly
marked. 43% of women in the age group 15 to 19 name the Palestinian people
as their ultimate attachment compared to 34% of women in general. Loyalty
to Islam among women seems not to be affected by age, but has broadly the
same size of constituency in all age groups.
<p>

<i>Table 9.10 Ultimate loyalty by arrest record of household members</i><br>

<table border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=5>

<tr align=center><td align=left></td><td>Househod<br>member<br>arrested</td><td>Household<br>member not<br>arrested</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Family</td><td>38</td><td>46</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Palestinian people</td><td>38</td><td>29</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Arab nation</td><td>4</td><td>2</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Islamic nation</td><td>17</td><td>17</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>None</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Don't know</td><td>3</td><td>5</td></tr>
<tr align=center><td align=left>Total</td><td>36</td><td>64</td></tr>

</table>

<P>
The picture that emerges from men's responses indicates different trends.
The data suggests that among younger men loyalties are shifting from the
family to Islam with the inroads of Islamic militancy most marked in the
youngest age group. A comparison between the answers of young women and
men suggests almost a feminisation of the Palestinian national movement.
Currently, Palestinian nationalism seems to be recruiting many more of its
most devoted adherents from the ranks of young women, rather than young
men.

<P>
In relation to the inroads of Islamic militancy, again age, more than education,
seems to have the greater impact. Except for men with no education, educational
levels do not seem to affect political loyalties. For instance, whereas
32% of the best educated men defined their primary loyalty as Palestine
and 27% as Islam, among those with only 1 to 6 years of education, 27% state
Palestine and 23% Islam. The picture is similar for women. Ultimate political
identities and loyalties seem to remain largely unaltered by the educational
process.

<P>
Unlike political preferences, ultimate political loyalties have a clear
association with economic status. The relationship can be seen by looking
at the economic background of individuals with different political loyalties
(Figure 9.21).
<p>

<i>Figure 9.21 Political loyalties by economic strata</i><br>

<img src="bilder/921.gif">

<P>
This figure demonstrates that those whose primary loyalty is focused on
the family or the Palestinian national movement come more or less equally
from all economic strata. Contrary to commonly accepted views, however,
this table would suggest that Islamic militancy is not primarily generated
by economic deprivation and distress. Islamic militants are more commonly
drawn from the upper, but especially the middle, economic echelons of the
Palestinian population. In this respect Islamic activists are very similar
to ethnic nationalist activists to whom they are structurally and ideologically
akin. Like ethnic nationalism, the data suggests that the Islamic movement
is not so much fuelled by despair as it is fed by the frustrations of the
middle sections of society, especially the frustrations of young, reasonably
educated individuals whose upward mobility in society is blocked. The inability
of many Palestinians to translate their education into white collar employment
is one such block. But the most important one is the occupation regime itself.

<P>
It has frequently been noted that the Israeli policy of mass detention has
functioned to transform Israeli detention centres and prisons in the occupied
territories into advanced training centres for political activists. A comparison
of the responses of those individuals who had at least one of the members
of their household arrested during the period of the intifada could suggest
tentatively that the experience has had a politicising effect and the effect
is uniformly in one direction, a reinforcement of Palestinian loyalties.
Islamic sentiments appear to remain unaffected.<a href="9_notes.html#5"><sup>5</sup></a><BR>

</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td align = center>

<a href="_._.html"><img src="../../../../../../../sys/almashriq-bottom-line.gif"alt = "----------------" border= 0></a><p><pre>
<a href="../../../../../../../base/mailpage.html">al@mashriq</a>                       960428/960710</pre>

</table>

</center>

</body>
</html>