💾 Archived View for gemini.bunburya.eu › newsgroups › gemini › messages › dsrh7i-it8.ln1@clipper.uni… captured on 2024-08-31 at 12:16:45. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2022-06-04)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
From: Stephane Tougard <stephane@unices.org>
Subject: Re: Gemini is no social network
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 16:17:01 +0100
Message-ID: <dsrh7i-it8.ln1@clipper.unices.org>
On 2021-11-28, rtr <rtr@nospam.invalid> wrote:
I do agree that gemini should be a "read-only" protocol with
I don't.
Unless the point is only to display text pages over the network (the
network already plenty of tools and protocols to do such things).
The point of Gemini is not to reduce the functionnality to a bare
minimum, it's to ensure a consistency in the way information should be
displayed.
But it does not remove the need for such protocol to build business
application for example. An accounting software could be using Gemini
for example.
We need the ability to receive and send information, build forms and
dynamic software to answer those forms.
Parent:
Re: Gemini is no social network (by rtr <rtr@nospam.invalid> on Sun, 28 Nov 2021 17:48:48 +0800)
Start of thread:
Gemini is no social network (by David <david@arch.invalid> on Thu, 18 Nov 2021 22:40:59 +0100)
Children:
Re: Gemini is no social network (by rtr <rtr@nospam.invalid> on Wed, 1 Dec 2021 22:54:07 +0800)