💾 Archived View for cerberusinvestigations.darkcloud.ca › quantum-theory.gmi captured on 2024-08-31 at 11:27:18. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2024-07-08)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
1) Let's assume that the simulation argument is true
To understand this post you will have to have knowledge and understand The Simulation Argument by Nick bostrom.
2) Let's also assume that many worlds theory is true
To understand this post you will also need knowledge of the Many Worlds interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.
3) Let's also assume that determinism is both true and not true
Determinism is the idea that you have no free will. Random chance doesn't exist and there is no choice.
I think we do have free will to some extent but the only copies of us that make it to the end are the ones who made approved choices.
Ever almost die and start believing that someone was looking out for you?
Let's start by saying I've read a new article that is allegedly supposed to change quantum theory but I don't agree with it. On Scientific American, the article is called This Twist on Schrodinger's Cat Paradox Has Major Implications for Quantum Theory.
I'll tell you why. The main idea from the article and a lot of theorists is that observers, or macro objects, can't be in a quantum superposition.
I disagree with this and believe it is false.
I think both observers would split universes and end up going off on their own paths with copies of all their friends and family. Because if we are in a computer simulation, everything could be in quantum superpositions.
This is where things get really insane. I'll tie together many worlds, determinism and simulation theory. Prepare to be mind blown.
You have free will as long as your choices contribute towards the end goal of the simulation. It's quite amazingly simple.
Think about it. Computer resources are scarce. Would you really try computing every possible decision, wrist movement, etc? You would have a number of simulations so compoundingly high that you likely wouldn't have enough energy to power it. One simulation would require a star.
If one simulation requires a star, how would anyone run a simulation with an incomprehensible number of copies?
They don't simulate all that because they use shortcuts to conserve energy. Running the simulation is cheaper if it doesn't emulate all ten dimensions. It just emulates what is needed by the observers to get to the end goal.
If a tree falls in a forest, and there are no observers that can 'hear', does it make a sound?
No, because it would be a waste of computing resources to render unused sound. Just like a computer game wouldn't render audio your character can't hear.
Gods are all real but they are just developers (programmers), help desk support (GMs), disgruntled ex-employees and hackers (demons) using GM powers, a term I borrow from World of Warcraft. Jesus hacked the water object in his inventory menu and changed it into wine. After being killed, used his GM class powers to self-rez.
When we shoot down UFO space ships that seem to pop into existence with strange engines, we get the same tech upgrades you would find if you were playing a video game. Are they aliens from other planets? Or computer generated NPC craft?
The idea would be that instead of angels showing up with GM powers, they spawn UFOs to give us technology in a secret way. This might happen when a world fails to make the choices required to naturally reach the deterministic end goal of the simulation.
The simulation could then save computing resources and lower energy requirements, because many worlds would be limited to the worlds that might reach the final goal.
Aliens would also increase the computation and energy requirements of a simulation. This is likely the reason why they haven't been rendered into existence yet.
They won't exist unless there is a computational and end goal requirement. At this point in time we're not ready to meet Aliens, so we likely won't discover them until we are ready.
It is likely that UFOs are just random computer generated ships, which is why they just appear. The engine uses unknown physics, but doesn't travel instantly from an alien world.
Another possibility is that some worlds might have potential at reaching the end goal.
Yet, they are on a path to destruction or need technology that won't be obtained on their path because of the choices made.
The aliens are us but from another one of these simulations and were allowed to find us so we can get a tech uplift.
Perhaps the programmers do it themselves.
A video game example (so many lol): Imagine you're Gordon Freeman and you build a teleporter to travel across Earth but end up in another world.
There may be a small handful of different worlds going to the end goal at different rates and on alternative paths.
Kind of like the TV Show Fringe (a must watch!). The plot of this show involved an alternate universe with better technology, but our universe first figured out how to travel to another world.
Yet another possibility: Many worlds - but just different players doing things their own way
Yup. The other possibility is based on Roy: A life Well lived - Rick and Morty. Many worlds are many worlds, you are the player. Everyone who plays you could make different choices in your life. Free will exists only in the person controlling you.
The spectrum of chance here would be represented by the number of players who earned achievements in a video game.
A real life example: I've played Xbox One a lot, and noticed that some achievements have only been completed by a certain percentage of players. This could be reflected on leaderboards outside the simulation.
Literally everything causes universe splits. You might argue that a coin toss isn't a 50/50 chance because of the different ways in which your wrist could move. Just let that sink in, the many ways in which your wrist could move would be a spectrum of chance across a spectrum.
Schrödinger's cat is both dead and alive. What we can't know is how often its dead and how often its alive unless we can measure the deterministic variables that would predict the future, but there are billions. People try to do this with the weather and they're pretty close but often wrong.
Is it dead and alive at a 50/50 rate? or at a 25/75 rate?
One thing that could effect this rate is concious influence through requests to the programmers. Another point of influence would be the variables that make an event less chance prone, ie deterministic.
Possible wrist movements * possible coin landings = spectrum of chance for the many worlds copies of you.
Any manner of superstition should work to engage with the spectrum of chance. A wish, a prayer, Chaos Magic or countless other ways in which you could obtain a chance rate at effecting probability.
You make the prayer and there would be a whole spectrum of you, some would get it and some wouldn't. This would conserve computer resources because if your universe splitting request is for object or desire the simulation doesn't want you to have or doesn't think will help, then the chance is likely closer to zero percent.
Perhaps the programmers don't like you because you're always bothering them with stupid requests. That might also contribute to your chance getting closer to zero.
Don't be annoying or a greedy when you make requests of the programmers.
If you don't try to split the universe, you'll fail. You're doing it without even realizing it. Navigating through the 5th dimensional probability space is what splits the universe. Navigation through this space involves invoking spectrum of chance events.
It's like the book The Secret is all about. Think positive and you'll influence spectrum of chance events.
Scary Implications (Conspiracy theory alert)
If we are living in a computer simulation with a deterministic end goal then it could explain the pandemic. It is possible that the mass manipulation of people through the media has lead to the programmers taking more direct action to fight climate change. I imagine that a healthy planet is probably part of the simulations end goal, but business interests keep staggering our attempt to mitigate damages to the planet.
Enter COVID19, a virus that is more deadly to the age group that fights climate change. The alt-right reject face masks, so we have another vulnerable group to the virus that just happens to also fight climate change.
People keep talking about this thing in the conspiracy circles as if its a hoax, or an unleashed bioweapon, population control, etc. It's all lunacy.
I would imagine that it is quite real and that its probably the programmers, not the governments. That's why it seems kind of manufactured and designed but kind of a surprise too.
Freemasons would love this stuff. It really sounds like the Great Architech(s) of the Universe might be developers working on a simulation.
Perhaps we are all in one big virtual MMORPG simulation, run on many different instances which to us look like many worlds. Perhaps its a simulation to a scientific non-video game based end goal, like learning how to escape a simulation.
This sounds really crazy, are you insane?
It's just something to think about. It both compliments, replaces and explains all modern religions and quantum mechanics. We're just in a computer.
This is all theory and/or a religious belief system and I welcome people to contact me and tell me why I'm wrong or debate with me. I can change my opinions based on new information, if I feel it fits.
There should be no hate, discrimination or bullying due to race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, marital status, family status or disability.
Let's preach love instead of hate.
What now?
Calm down, relax, drink some water, self-care and just act normal. Whatever the simulation is, there is no point in changing your life except to stop using religion as an false excuse to hate people.
Thanks for reading!
(C) Copyright 2022 - Cerberus Investigations
Best viewed in Lagrange