💾 Archived View for gemi.dev › gemini-mailing-list › 000109.gmi captured on 2024-08-25 at 09:23:01. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-12-28)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[ANN] md2gemini release v1.1.0 and gemini linking discussion

1. colecmac (a) protonmail.com (colecmac (a) protonmail.com)

Hello Geminauts,

I've just released v1.1.0 of md2gemini[1], I hope you're all proud. ;)

I'm not just emailing to plug my project though. This new release adds
support for footnotes as an alternative way to handle inline links,
which markdown supports but text/gemini doesn't. You can see an example
of how these footnotes look in my email here. md2gemini will automatically
create footnotes for all your inline links in markdown, if you enable it.

md2gemini actually offers several linking options: breaking up the paragraph
to directly link, removing all links, footnotes at the end of each
paragraph, or footnotes at the end of the document - like my email.

There was some discussion in another thread about having inline links
in text/gemini, which solderpunk rejected because it would make
parsing much more difficult. I agree with him, and so I wonder what
others on this list think of my take on this. Does using footnotes make
sense? Are there better, or just different ways to do solve this problem?


1: https://github.com/makeworld-the-better-one/md2gemini

makeworld

Link to individual message.

2. Ben (benulo (a) systemli.org)

For my part, I already started putting the "at-end" option to work 
(links at the end of the document). The result is working for me 
beautifully.

On 5/19/20 7:33 AM, colecmac at protonmail.com wrote:
> Does using footnotes make sense? Are there better, or just different 
ways to do solve this problem?

-- 
gemini://kwiecien.us/

Link to individual message.

3. Jason McBrayer (jmcbray (a) carcosa.net)

colecmac at protonmail.com writes:

> There was some discussion in another thread about having inline links
> in text/gemini, which solderpunk rejected because it would make
> parsing much more difficult. I agree with him, and so I wonder what
> others on this list think of my take on this. Does using footnotes make
> sense? Are there better, or just different ways to do solve this problem?

As a 'best practice', and not as a specification, I prefer using
footnotes after each paragraph. I'm glad to see your program supports
that option.

-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------+  
| Jason F. McBrayer                    jmcbray at carcosa.net  |  
| If someone conquers a thousand times a thousand others in |  
| battle, and someone else conquers himself, the latter one |  
| is the greatest of all conquerors.  --- The Dhammapada    |

Link to individual message.

---

Previous Thread: [ANN] another Gemini server, blizanci

Next Thread: Announcing garnet, a new (soon-to-be) TUI client