💾 Archived View for yujiri.xyz › game-design › portal-energy-ball-laser.gmi captured on 2024-08-25 at 02:08:23. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Mechanic analysis: Portal 2's energy ball replacement

written 2024-07-09

In Portal 1 there's a machine that shoots an energy ball that can travel through portals and that you have to guide into a receiver. Portal 2 adds a lot of new puzzle mechanics like gels and excursion funnels, but removes the energy balls, replacing them with a machine that shoots a laser that has to go into a receiver. The two mechanics are similar but the lasers are better for quality of life, because:

The energy balls have travel time, so after you set up the solution you have to wait for it to actually complete. The lasers are instant.

Energy balls can get into places where it's hard to get them back, and to prevent this from being a major problem, they had to give them lifetime. Energy balls disappear after enough time and the machine shoots another. But there's still problems; if you get the ball into a weird place, you have to wait for it to die, which can take a while. And sometimes it dies in the middle of trying to execute your solution.

What about the puzle design space they create? This is a more two-sided comparison; each mechanic creates some that the other doesn't:

Because of the travel time, you can pass one energy ball through multiple portals, whereas you can't with lasers.

Once a ball receiver receives the ball, it stays on forever. Whereas a laser receiver turns off if it stops receiving the laser. This means that energy ball puzzles can be broken down into isolated parts (Testchamber 17 in Portal 1 is a good example), while laser puzzles can't. Isolated parts are bad for depth.

Depth

This analysis convinces me that the lasers are a better mechanic overall than the energy balls.