💾 Archived View for gemini.bunburya.eu › newsgroups › gemini › messages › tjpafp$1g68k$1@news.mixmin… captured on 2024-08-24 at 23:56:57. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Gemini Cryptography Protocol Proposal

Message headers

From: Text Master <text@mast.er>

Subject: Gemini Cryptography Protocol Proposal

Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 15:17:35 -0500

Message-ID: <tjpafp$1g68k$1@news.mixmin.net>

Message content

I see mandatory TLS or any mandatory crypto scheme as a grey goo problem

that creates limitations and unnecessary complexity and overhead that

will grow like grey goo over time.

Communication protocols should be crypto and cipher-agnostic. The

end-user client and server should decide how to proceed with crypto.

Putting all eggs in one crypto basket is ill-advised.

There are many potential use cases for different crypto schemes or no

crypto at all. Being bound to one crypto scheme hampers and complicates

a lot of potential and imaginative use cases.

I suggest that going forward the protocol definition have a header

instruction that allows negotiation of different crypto schemes, or no

scheme at all.

It is also possible to have schemes that serve digitally signed plain

text over a clear text connection, without an encrypted channel. Such

would be perfectly suited for a public-facing site that is serving only

public text. This provides authenticity without the TLS overhead, and

allows any custom arrangement of ciphering, key exchange, certificate

authority and authentication that servers and clients would desire.

We don't need yet another mandatory cryptosystem in between every

communication in every context.

I propose for your consideration:

Adjust the Gemini protocol with a clear standard requirement that the

protocol itself be cryptography neutral or 'crypto agnostic'.

Adjust the Gemini protocol with a clear standard that the protocol

itself is concerned only with the format and stream between endpoints.

Adjust the Gemini protocol with a clear standard requirement that

decisions regarding encryption, authentication and connection security

be left up to the designers of clients and servers and the endpoint users.

Adjust the Gemini protocol with a clear standard header instruction for

the negotiation, selection, and establishment of cryptographic

primitives, signatures, authentication, or lack thereof.

--

Text Master

YE4RVOOQ46VI47W2TIMT56QEHGIQQM4DNEIRQXU6FXPZX5IV6NTA

Related

Children:

Re: Gemini Cryptography Protocol Proposal (by D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> on Mon, 31 Oct 2022 21:12:44 -0000 (UTC))

Re: Gemini Cryptography Protocol Proposal (by Reset Reboot <reset.reboot@posteo.net> on Thu, 03 Nov 2022 18:40:35 +0100)

Re: Gemini Cryptography Protocol Proposal (by news@zzo38computer.org.invalid on Sat, 05 Nov 2022 10:17:24 -0700)