💾 Archived View for gemini.bunburya.eu › newsgroups › gemini › messages › stt525$5qb$1@gioia.aioe.or… captured on 2024-08-24 at 23:56:03. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2022-04-28)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: Gemini markup extensions [Was: Re: a solution for emphasis]

Message headers

From: Martin <martin@datapulp.de>

Subject: Re: Gemini markup extensions [Was: Re: a solution for emphasis]

Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 08:10:56 +0100

Message-ID: <stt525$5qb$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Message content

Am 07.02.22 um 11:33 schrieb Gustaf Erikson:

Please note however, that I am not proposing a *specification* change,
merely that enough clients recognize the "*"/"_" convention to enable a
writer to be relatively confident that they can use this "markup" as
intended.

The German Newspaper "Tageszeitung" from Berlin gemini://taz.de uses

My personal opinion would be, that having somewhat agreed markup would

lead to less use of abusing special unicode characters for fulfilling

this obvious need. So it would help people using a screenreader. Also it

would not end an a chaos of different own ideas.

Martin

Related

Parent:

Re: Gemini markup extensions [Was: Re: a solution for emphasis] (by Gustaf Erikson <gerikson@gmial.com> on Mon, 07 Feb 2022 11:33:13 +0100)

Start of thread:

a solution for emphasis (by Gustaf Erikson <gerikson@gmial.com> on Sat, 05 Feb 2022 00:13:15 +0100)

Children:

Re: Gemini markup extensions [Was: Re: a solution for emphasis] (by Daniel Goldsmith <dgold@dgold.invalid> on Tue, 8 Feb 2022 12:05:19 +0000)