💾 Archived View for gemini.bunburya.eu › newsgroups › gemini › messages › dsrh7i-it8.ln1@clipper.uni… captured on 2024-08-25 at 00:02:42. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2022-06-04)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: Gemini is no social network

Message headers

From: Stephane Tougard <stephane@unices.org>

Subject: Re: Gemini is no social network

Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 16:17:01 +0100

Message-ID: <dsrh7i-it8.ln1@clipper.unices.org>

Message content

On 2021-11-28, rtr <rtr@nospam.invalid> wrote:

I do agree that gemini should be a "read-only" protocol with

I don't.

Unless the point is only to display text pages over the network (the

network already plenty of tools and protocols to do such things).

The point of Gemini is not to reduce the functionnality to a bare

minimum, it's to ensure a consistency in the way information should be

displayed.

But it does not remove the need for such protocol to build business

application for example. An accounting software could be using Gemini

for example.

We need the ability to receive and send information, build forms and

dynamic software to answer those forms.

Related

Parent:

Re: Gemini is no social network (by rtr <rtr@nospam.invalid> on Sun, 28 Nov 2021 17:48:48 +0800)

Start of thread:

Gemini is no social network (by David <david@arch.invalid> on Thu, 18 Nov 2021 22:40:59 +0100)

Children:

Re: Gemini is no social network (by "C.Botulinum" <cbotulinum@cock.li> on Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:27:51 +0200)

Re: Gemini is no social network (by Pinku Basudei <pinku@straylight.freeside.l5> on Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:05:45 +0100)

Re: Gemini is no social network (by rtr <rtr@nospam.invalid> on Wed, 1 Dec 2021 22:54:07 +0800)

Re: Gemini is no social network (by Matthew Ernisse <matt@going-flying.com> on Tue, 7 Dec 2021 22:48:19 -0000 (UTC))

Re: Gemini is no social network (by Cyrus Valkonen <cyrus.valkonen@gmail.com> on Tue, 17 May 2022 01:27:30 +0200)