💾 Archived View for gemini.bunburya.eu › newsgroups › gemini › messages › 87iltlv66q.fsf@cassilda.ca… captured on 2024-08-25 at 00:02:05. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2022-04-28)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
From: Jason McBrayer <jmcbray@carcosa.net>
Subject: Re: Gemini markup extensions [Was: Re: a solution for emphasis]
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 09:17:17 -0500
Message-ID: <87iltlv66q.fsf@cassilda.carcosa.net>
Vlad Markov <vlad@happy.dwarf7.net> writes:
On 2022-02-07, Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid> wrote:
I do not think any more rendering directives should be added to gemini.
If more advanced rendering is required then use a pdf document A gemini
URL can point to a pdf document. There is little value in recreating
HTML in gemini.
I do think gemtext should be declared "done", and no extensions
added. But it's perfectly reasonable to serve other content-types over
Gemini. I'm strongly considering serving org-mode text.
--
Jason McBrayer | “Strange is the night where black stars rise,
jmcbray@carcosa.net | and strange moons circle through the skies,
| but stranger still is lost Carcosa.”
| ― Robert W. Chambers,The King in Yellow
Parent:
Start of thread:
a solution for emphasis (by Gustaf Erikson <gerikson@gmial.com> on Sat, 05 Feb 2022 00:13:15 +0100)
Children: