💾 Archived View for gemini.bunburya.eu › newsgroups › gemini › messages › slrnt98c4v.15v1.danrl@tuna… captured on 2024-08-24 at 23:53:30. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2022-06-04)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Intend to standardize via RFC?

Message headers

From: Dan Luedtke <d@x.gl>

Subject: Intend to standardize via RFC?

Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 02:49:03 -0000 (UTC)

Message-ID: <slrnt98c4v.15v1.danrl@tunafish.local>

Message content

Are there efforts underway to standardize Gemini via IETF RFC?

Gemini the protocol and gemtext the file format are currently in a single

specification. Furthermore, the specification is a bit blurry around the edges

as Stephane Bortzmeyer pointed out a while ago. I've read various opinions

regarding TOFU and certificate change/renewal.. Embarking on the route to RFC

could improve the specification without changing its simplicity.

What's the sentiment regarding a clearer specification?

Related

Children:

Re: Intend to standardize via RFC? (by "Szczezuja.space" <szczezuja@sdf.org> on Mon, 30 May 2022 19:19:01 -0000 (UTC))

Re: Intend to standardize via RFC? (by Sean Conner <spc@lucy.roswell.conman.org> on Mon, 30 May 2022 23:01:56 -0000 (UTC))