💾 Archived View for gemi.dev › gemini-mailing-list › 000822.gmi captured on 2024-08-19 at 02:12:23. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-12-28)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[users] Announcing Gemini Discovery at gemini://discovery.geminiprotocol.com/

1. Nathan Galt (mailinglists (a) ngalt.com)

Gemini Discovery is now up and running. In a nutshell, it's a directory of 
search engines and directories. It's available at:

gemini://discovery.geminiprotocol.com/

It mostly serves two audiences:



If you'd like a page that links to most of the gemini-discovery services 
out there, check it out.

Link to individual message.

2. Omar Polo (op (a) omarpolo.com)


Nathan Galt <mailinglists@ngalt.com> writes:

> Gemini Discovery is now up and running. In a nutshell, it's a directory 
of search engines and directories. It's available at:
>
> gemini://discovery.geminiprotocol.com/
>
> It mostly serves two audiences:
>
> * people who want to find new/updated things on Gemini
> * people who want other people to be able to find their (new) capsules
>
> If you'd like a page that links to most of the gemini-discovery services 
out there, check it out.

I'm not able to load the page on any clients (porcelain, lagrange,
tinmop & my secret little project) on OpenBSD.  All of them complains
about a failure during the handshake :/

Link to individual message.

3. Stephane Bortzmeyer (stephane (a) sources.org)

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:07:35AM +0100,
 Omar Polo <op@omarpolo.com> wrote 
 a message of 17 lines which said:

> I'm not able to load the page on any clients (porcelain, lagrange,
> tinmop & my secret little project) on OpenBSD.  All of them complains
> about a failure during the handshake :/

No problem with Lagrange or Amfora here. gnutls-cli shows no TLS
issue:

 % gnutls-cli --insecure -p 1965 discovery.geminiprotocol.com
Processed 0 CA certificate(s).
Resolving 'discovery.geminiprotocol.com:1965'...
Connecting to '95.217.134.139:1965'...
- Certificate type: X.509
- Got a certificate list of 1 certificates.
- Certificate[0] info:
 - subject `EMAIL=admin@geminiprotocol.com,CN=discovery.geminiprotocol.com,
C=se', issuer 
`EMAIL=admin@geminiprotocol.com,CN=discovery.geminiprotocol.com,C=se', 
serial 0x4c149bab68907b80691f37bbfae5c30ef6a6ae6d, EdDSA (Ed25519) key 256 
bits, signed using EdDSA-Ed25519, activated `2021-03-14 18:03:31 UTC', 
expires `2040-12-31 18:03:31 UTC', 
pin-sha256="wPXjqjkOcGyL4cY7RGy4ctMLDZfxfTXxgHkKQY9A+bc="
	Public Key ID:
		sha1:a105e4d487cbef2db156c4cb5413e27382b2b1fd
		sha256:c0f5e3aa390e706c8be1c63b446cb872d30b0d97f17d35f180790a418f40f9b7
	Public Key PIN:
		pin-sha256:wPXjqjkOcGyL4cY7RGy4ctMLDZfxfTXxgHkKQY9A+bc=

- Status: The certificate is NOT trusted. The certificate issuer is unknown. 

- Successfully sent 0 certificate(s) to server.
- Description: (TLS1.2-X.509)-(ECDHE-X25519)-(EdDSA-Ed25519)-(AES-256-GCM)
- Session ID: 
F8:63:9A:89:C8:0B:8A:C7:58:15:8F:74:23:00:95:A5:67:D8:F8:FE:5F:40:FD:4F:8A:
4B:AE:31:44:31:23:D6
- Options: extended master secret, safe renegotiation,
- Handshake was completed

Link to individual message.

4. Katarina Eriksson (gmym (a) coopdot.com)

Omar Polo <op@omarpolo.com> wrote:

Nathan Galt <mailinglists@ngalt.com> writes:
> Gemini Discovery is now up and running. In a nutshell, it's a directory 
of search engines and directories. It's available at:
>
> gemini://discovery.geminiprotocol.com/

> I'm not able to load the page on any clients (porcelain, lagrange,
> tinmop & my secret little project) on OpenBSD. All of them complains
> about a failure during the handshake :/

I'm doing the hosting and will respond to you off list for troubleshooting.

--
Katarina

Link to individual message.

5. Omar Polo (op (a) omarpolo.com)


Stephane Bortzmeyer <stephane@sources.org> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:07:35AM +0100,
>  Omar Polo <op@omarpolo.com> wrote 
>  a message of 17 lines which said:
>
>> I'm not able to load the page on any clients (porcelain, lagrange,
>> tinmop & my secret little project) on OpenBSD.  All of them complains
>> about a failure during the handshake :/
>
> No problem with Lagrange or Amfora here. gnutls-cli shows no TLS
> issue:
>
>  % gnutls-cli --insecure -p 1965 discovery.geminiprotocol.com
> Processed 0 CA certificate(s).
> Resolving 'discovery.geminiprotocol.com:1965'...
> Connecting to '95.217.134.139:1965'...
> - Certificate type: X.509
> - Got a certificate list of 1 certificates.
> - Certificate[0] info:
>  - subject 
`EMAIL=admin@geminiprotocol.com,CN=discovery.geminiprotocol.com,C=se', 
issuer `EMAIL=admin@geminiprotocol.com,CN=discovery.geminiprotocol.com,C=se
', serial 0x4c149bab68907b80691f37bbfae5c30ef6a6ae6d, EdDSA (Ed25519) key 
256 bits, signed using EdDSA-Ed25519, activated `2021-03-14 18:03:31 UTC', 
expires `2040-12-31 18:03:31 UTC', 
pin-sha256="wPXjqjkOcGyL4cY7RGy4ctMLDZfxfTXxgHkKQY9A+bc="

not a tls experts, but I think my issues are caused by the ed25519 key.
I recall reading something that libressl don't support those keys yet
(please correct me if I'm wrong)

; nc -c -Tnoverify discovery.geminiprotocol.com 1965
nc: tls handshake failed (handshake failed: error:1404B410:SSL 
routines:ST_CONNECT:sslv3 alert handshake failure)


> 	Public Key ID:
> 		sha1:a105e4d487cbef2db156c4cb5413e27382b2b1fd
> 		sha256:c0f5e3aa390e706c8be1c63b446cb872d30b0d97f17d35f180790a418f40f9b7
> 	Public Key PIN:
> 		pin-sha256:wPXjqjkOcGyL4cY7RGy4ctMLDZfxfTXxgHkKQY9A+bc=
>
> - Status: The certificate is NOT trusted. The certificate issuer is unknown. 
> *** PKI verification of server certificate failed...
> - Successfully sent 0 certificate(s) to server.
> - Description: (TLS1.2-X.509)-(ECDHE-X25519)-(EdDSA-Ed25519)-(AES-256-GCM)
> - Session ID: 
F8:63:9A:89:C8:0B:8A:C7:58:15:8F:74:23:00:95:A5:67:D8:F8:FE:5F:40:FD:4F:8A:
4B:AE:31:44:31:23:D6
> - Options: extended master secret, safe renegotiation,
> - Handshake was completed

Link to individual message.

6. Stephane Bortzmeyer (stephane (a) sources.org)

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:30:14AM +0100,
 Omar Polo <op@omarpolo.com> wrote 
 a message of 44 lines which said:

> not a tls experts, but I think my issues are caused by the ed25519 key.
> I recall reading something that libressl don't support those keys yet

If so, this is certainly a serious problem with LibreSSL. RFC 8410,
which added these keys in certificates, is already 2.5 years old.

According to Lupa
<gemini://gemini.bortzmeyer.org/software/lupa/stats.gmi>, 8 capsules
use this type of key. Can you connect to them:

         name          |   lastsuccessfulconnect    | certalgorithm 
-----------------------+----------------------------+---------------
 lord.re               | 2021-03-16 07:45:22.190857 | ED25519
 tdem.in               | 2021-03-14 19:06:25.216331 | ED25519
 erion.cf              | 2021-03-13 09:00:36.070426 | ED25519
 fern91.com            | 2021-03-13 07:28:30.499848 | ED25519
 gemini.eletrotupi.com | 2021-03-13 05:55:16.892495 | ED25519
 earnestma.xyz         | 2021-03-10 14:27:00.991546 | ED25519
 antonmcclure.com      | 2021-03-09 19:22:56.702628 | ED25519
 cfdocs.wetterberg.nu  | 2021-03-06 09:38:35.085335 | ED25519

Link to individual message.

---

Previous Thread: SDF has set up Gemini service for its MetaARPA users

Next Thread: [tech] LibreSSL and ed25519 (Re: [users] Announcing Gemini Discovery at gemini://discovery.geminiprotocol.com/)