💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › stack › 18230 captured on 2024-08-19 at 01:05:46. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: "New York Times is Silent on Debate"
I think they had many meetings and waited for the OK from the DNC. As my Republican friend had predicted, they waited for the day after the primaries, and scheduled the debate ridiculously early to allow enough time to propagandize the next guy.
Jun 29 · 7 weeks ago
@stack you are right, there was nothing in the paper edition the morning after the debate. They waited until the Saturday paper because they needed to be careful that they had permission from all the right people.
New York Times is Silent on Debate — Because it didn't go well for Biden... Not just the front page; there is no mention of the debate in the entire paper... Trump came off as a liar, which these days is normal for a politician. A bit scary but surprisingly civilized. Biden on the other hand, sounded like the cranky mean old fart and couldn't string two sentences together, and announced that he beat medicaid... I expected NYT to at least mention this event, which has opened up a public...