💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › stack › 18222 captured on 2024-08-19 at 01:05:44. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2024-07-09)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: "New York Times is Silent on Debate"
The paper edition had nothing. I read a few articles online, one with a graph of minutes spent insulting the other side (with whatever methodology Trump was double the Biden's time, although subjectively it really felt that Biden did more -- probably because the rest of what he said was nonsense)
Jun 29 · 7 weeks ago
Not silent any more :)
"The New York Times’s editorial board has called on Joe Biden to drop out of the 2024 presidential race after a disastrous debate performance against Donald Trump."
🚀 stack [OP] · Jun 29 at 22:08:
I think they had many meetings and waited for the OK from the DNC. As my Republican friend had predicted, they waited for the day after the primaries, and scheduled the debate ridiculously early to allow enough time to propagandize the next guy.
@stack you are right, there was nothing in the paper edition the morning after the debate. They waited until the Saturday paper because they needed to be careful that they had permission from all the right people.
New York Times is Silent on Debate — Because it didn't go well for Biden... Not just the front page; there is no mention of the debate in the entire paper... Trump came off as a liar, which these days is normal for a politician. A bit scary but surprisingly civilized. Biden on the other hand, sounded like the cranky mean old fart and couldn't string two sentences together, and announced that he beat medicaid... I expected NYT to at least mention this event, which has opened up a public...