๐Ÿ’พ Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org โ€บ u โ€บ norayr โ€บ 19028 captured on 2024-08-19 at 01:00:00. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

โžก๏ธ Next capture (2024-08-31)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Comment by ๐Ÿ™ norayr

Re: "i have this feeling about lowtech (not permacomputing) that..."

In: s/permacomputing

so there are technologies that are standardized, polished, but they are also authorinarian, enforced, imperialistic.

gemini, on the contrary is a human scale design. walkabre space, where you don't need a car to explore it. simple bicycle is more than enough.

๐Ÿ™ norayr [OP]

Aug 09 ยท 10 days ago

3 Later Comments โ†“

๐Ÿ™ norayr [OP] ยท Aug 09 at 00:09:

not standardized environments, unlike facebook or even mastodon, are weird, so the mind starts to raise questions and think of things that it wouldn't be thinking of in the standardized non-weird environment.

๐Ÿ™ norayr [OP] ยท Aug 09 at 00:13:

so mind is engaged with important quetions.

that is arno the reason why authoritarian regimes are trying to fence the citizens from weird things.

this is actually almost a quote of paul tillich, on cities

๐ŸŽต xavi ยท Aug 10 at 13:09:

Maybe you should scc:

โ€” scc, a simple C compiler

It is mostly written by one person (which I happen to know personally) and builds ISO C99 programs with qbe.

Original Post

๐ŸŒ’ s/permacomputing

i have this feeling about lowtech (not permacomputing) that gcc is not lowtech. however, tcc is. we feel that c is lowtech, because it has a small syntax and it is possible to write efficient code with it, but we forget that the c we use has lots of corporate investments, lots of language extensions, and the compiler compiles in hours. tcc is lowtech, because it supports standard c without extensions and it is easy to compile it. however, it is not possible to compile linux kernes with tcc....

๐Ÿ’ฌ norayr ยท 7 comments ยท Aug 08 ยท 10 days ago