💾 Archived View for gemini.bunburya.eu › newsgroups › gemini › messages › 87r18f3r12.fsf@news.geriks… captured on 2024-08-18 at 17:26:09. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2022-04-28)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
From: Gustaf Erikson <gerikson@gmial.com>
Subject: Re: Gemini markup extensions [Was: Re: a solution for emphasis]
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 11:33:13 +0100
Message-ID: <87r18f3r12.fsf@news.gerikson.com>
Luca Saiu <luca@ageinghacker.net> writes:
On 2022-02-05 at 00:13 +0100, Gustaf Erikson wrote, mostly in
gemini://gerikson.com/gemlog/gemini-sux/e-m-p-h-a-s-i-s.gmi :
[long interesting discussion snipped]
Thanks for taking the time to read my post and reply!
Please note however, that I am not proposing a *specification* change,
merely that enough clients recognize the "*"/"_" convention to enable a
writer to be relatively confident that they can use this "markup" as
intended.
I think that Gemini as it stands is a worse fit for technical writing
than for free-flow text.
I agree. To be fair, it's not meant to be all-encompassing.
Cheers,
/g.
--
.sig goes here
Parent:
Start of thread:
a solution for emphasis (by Gustaf Erikson <gerikson@gmial.com> on Sat, 05 Feb 2022 00:13:15 +0100)
Children: