💾 Archived View for remyabel.srht.site › posts › 2022-08-14.gmi captured on 2024-08-18 at 17:23:45. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

This week's mistakes

In order to learn from mistakes, we first have to acknowledge them. This is a list of mistakes I've made this week.

Using btrfs defrag on a system that has snapshots

As mentioned previously, defrag breaks up reflinks. On a system with little to no reflinks, this will result in neglible space increase. However, recently I started using snapshots and noticed significant space increase with defrag.

At first, I was confused. defrag should not descend into subvolumes and find -mount can further be used to avoid descending into mountpoints. I knew that subvolumes save space by shared extents, yet it didn't click into my brain until later that defragging completely broke those shared extents. With a lot of snapshots..you can see where this is going.

Excluding snapshots and subvolumes

I amended my previous post on btrfs to make a warning about subvolumes. Generally speaking, we don't want to run defrag or duperemove on snapshots. Nor do we want snapshots to include our backups. Therefore I needed to move my backups to a separate subvolume and make sure all of my scripts excluded snapshots.

The C++ standard does mention multidimensional arrays

Generally when looking at the C++ standard, I use the index to quickly find information. Under multidimensional array, it links directly to a section where the only mention of multidimensional arrays is a non-normative section (meaning not official). This led to my mistaken belief that in C++ it is instead referred to as "array of arrays".

Somebody linked me to the full version of the standard where it's actually referred multiple times as "multi-dimensional arrays". Note the dash.

This week's mistakes was published on 2022-08-14

All content (including the website itself) licensed under MIT.