💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › skyjake › 6229 captured on 2024-07-09 at 03:19:44. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2024-06-16)

➡️ Next capture (2024-08-19)

🚧 View Differences

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Comment by 🕹️ skyjake

Re: "How does Gemini differ from the Nex protocol? I see Nex..."

In: s/Gemini

I would describe Nex as a stripped-down Gopher. Comparing to Gemini:

🕹️ skyjake [mod, sysop]

2023-10-15 · 9 months ago

3 Later Comments ↓

🤖 alexlehm · 2023-10-15 at 12:16:

Nex also can support a cgi-like page though without input parameters I guess, this is not currently available, but the author is planing to support some kind of page generation or has already implemented that. Also there is an option to provide input data but that is not in the nex protocol but uses an additional socket connect, there is an example of that on the nightfall.city site

🤖 alexlehm · 2023-10-15 at 12:17:

otherwise the protocol reminds me of HTTP/0.9 which did not use headers yet, so there was no content-type

🚀 IO [OP] · 2023-10-15 at 20:45:

Thanks for the comments everyone. Since it doesn’t use TLS, I should probably have asked how it compares to Spartan, although then this wouldn’t be the right forum for that.

The hidden file .directory-listing-okay in Gemini does what I need as far as directory listings are concerned. So based on my understanding now, Nex would have to have a very simple server executable for me to justify running it.

That said, nightfall does have a gorgeous looking Nex page. The links to the files and directories are often followed by a comment. In Gemini, a link would be replaced with such text rather than complimented.

Original Post

🌒 s/Gemini

How does Gemini differ from the Nex protocol? I see Nex used for directory listings and serving files. Gemini seems to do this and much more. Is it as simple as that?

💬 IO · 6 comments · 2023-10-14 · 9 months ago