💾 Archived View for gemini.bortzmeyer.org › rfc-mirror › rfc4268.txt captured on 2024-07-09 at 01:25:15.
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Network Working Group S. Chisholm
Request for Comments: 4268 Nortel Networks
Category: Standards Track D. Perkins
SNMPinfo
November 2005
Entity State MIB
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
In particular, it describes extensions to the Entity MIB to provide
information about the state of physical entities.
In addition, this memo defines a set of Textual Conventions to
represent various states of an entity. The intent is that these
Textual Conventions will be imported and used in MIB modules that
would otherwise define their own representations.
Table of Contents
1. The Internet-Standard Management Framework ......................2
2. Entity State ....................................................2
2.1. Hierarchical State Management ..............................3
2.2. Entity Redundancy ..........................................3
2.3. Physical Entity Users ......................................3
2.4. Physical Class Behavior ....................................4
3. Relation to Other MIBs ..........................................4
3.1. Relation to the Interfaces MIB .............................4
3.2. Relation to Alarm MIB ......................................5
3.3. Relation to Bridge MIB .....................................5
3.4. Relation to the Host Resources MIB .........................5
4. Textual Conventions .............................................6
5. Definitions .................................................... 9
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
6. Security Considerations ........................................16
7. Acknowledgements ...............................................17
8. References .....................................................17
8.1. Normative References ......................................17
8.2. Informative References ....................................18
1. The Internet-Standard Management Framework
For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current
Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of
RFC 3410 [RFC3410].
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally
accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP).
Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the
Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB
module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58,
RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58, RFC 2580
[RFC2580].
2. Entity State
The goal in adding state objects to the Entity MIB [RFC4133] is to
define a useful subset of the possible state attributes that could be
tracked for a given entity and that both fit into the state models
such as those used in the Interfaces MIB [RFC2863] as well as
leverage existing well-deployed models. The entStateTable contains
state objects that are a subset of the popular ISO/OSI states that
are also defined in ITU's X.731 specification [X.731]. Objects are
defined to capture administrative, operational, and usage states. In
addition, there are further state objects defined to provide more
information for these three basic states.
Administrative state indicates permission to use or prohibition
against using the entity and is imposed through the management
services.
Operational state indicates whether or not the entity is physically
installed and working. Note that unlike the ifOperStatus [RFC2863],
this operational state is independent of the administrative state.
Usage state indicates whether or not the entity is in use at a
specific instance, and if so, whether or not it currently has spare
capacity to serve additional users. In the context of this MIB, the
usage state refers to the ability of an entity to service other
entities within its containment hierarchy.
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
Alarm state indicates whether or not there are any alarms active
against the entity. In addition to those alarm states defined in
X.731 [X.731], warning and indeterminate status are also defined to
provide a more complete mapping to the Alarm MIB [RFC3877].
Standby state indicates whether the entity is currently running as
hot standby or cold standby or is currently providing service.
The terms "state" and "status" are used interchangeably in this memo.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
2.1. Hierarchical State Management
Physical entities exist within a containment hierarchy. Physical
containment is defined by the entPhysicalContainedIn object[RFC4133].
This raises some interesting issues not addressed in existing work on
state management.
There are two types of state for an entity:
1) The state of the entity independent of the states of its parents
and children in its containment hierarchy. This is often referred to
as raw state.
2) The state of the entity, as it may be influenced by the state of
its parents and children. This is often referred to as computed
state.
All state objects in this memo are raw state.
2.2. Entity Redundancy
While this memo is not attempting to address the entire problem space
around redundancy, the entStateStandby object provides an important
piece of state information for entities, which helps identify which
pieces of redundant equipment are currently providing service, and
which are waiting in either hot or cold standby mode.
2.3. Physical Entity Users
There are three ways to define the 'user' of a physical entity
1. Direct containment in physical hierarchy
2. Anywhere in physical hierarchy
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
3. As defined by a means outside the scope of this MIB. This could
include logical interfaces that could run on a port, software that
could run on a module, etc.
Administrative, operational, alarm, and standby state use all three
definitions of 'user'. Usage state supports only the concept of
direct containment to simplify implementations of this object.
2.4. Physical Class Behavior
This MIB makes no effort to standardize the behaviors and
characteristics of the various physical classes [RFC4133], but rather
how this information is reported. In looking at real-world products,
items within the same physical class vary substantially. The MIB has
therefore provided guidance on how to support objects where a
particular instance of a physical class cannot support part or all of
a particular state.
3. Relation to Other MIBs
3.1. Relation to the Interfaces MIB
The Interfaces MIB [RFC2863] defines the ifAdminStatus object, which
has states of up, down, and testing, and the ifOperStatus object,
which has states of up, down, testing, unknown, dormant, notPresent,
and lowerLayerDown.
An ifAdminStatus of 'up' is equivalent to setting the entStateAdmin
object to 'unlocked'. An ifAdminStatus of 'down' is equivalent to
setting the entStateAdmin object to either 'locked' or
'shuttingDown', depending on a system's interpretation of 'down'.
An ifOperStatus of 'up' is equivalent to an entStateOper value of
'enabled'. An ifOperStatus of 'down' due to operational failure is
equivalent to an entStateOper value of 'disabled'. An ifOperStatus
of 'down' due to being administratively disabled is equivalent to an
entStateAdmin value of 'locked' and an entStateOper value of either
'enabled' or 'disabled' depending on whether there are any known
issues that would prevent the entity from becoming operational when
its entStateAdmin is set to 'unlocked'. An ifOperStatus of 'unknown'
is equivalent to an entStateOper value of 'unknown'. The
ifOperStatus values of 'testing' and 'dormant' are not explicitly
supported by this MIB, but the state objects will be able to reflect
other aspects of the entities' administrative and operational state.
The ifOperStatus values of 'notPresent' and 'lowerLayerDown' are in
some ways computed states and so are therefore not supported in this
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
MIB. They can, though, be computed by examining the states of
entities within this object's containment hierarchy and other
available related states.
3.2. Relation to Alarm MIB
The entStateAlarm object indicates whether or not there are any
active alarms against this entity. If there are active alarms, then
the alarmActiveTable in the Alarm MIB [RFC3877] should be searched
for rows whose alarmActiveResourceId matches this entPhysicalIndex.
Alternatively, if the alarmActiveTable is queried first and an active
alarm with a value of alarmActiveResourceId that matches this
entPhysicalIndex is found, then entStateAlarm can be used to quickly
determine if there are additional active alarms with a different
severity against this physical entity.
3.3 Relation to Bridge MIB
For entities of physical type of 'port' that support the
dot1dStpPortEnable object in the Bridge MIB [RFC4188], a value of
'enabled' is equivalent to setting the entStateAdmin object to
'unlocked'. Setting dot1dStpPortEnable to 'disabled' is equivalent
to setting the entStateAdmin object to 'locked'.
3.4 Relation to the Host Resources MIB
The hrDeviceStatus object in the Host Resources MIB [RFC2790]
provides an operational state for devices. For entities that
logically correspond to the concept of a device, a value of 'unknown'
for hrDeviceStatus corresponds to an entStateOper value of 'unknown'.
A value of 'running' corresponds to an entStateOper value of
'enabled'. A value of 'warning' also corresponds to an entStateOper
value of 'enabled', but with appropriate bits set in the
entStateAlarm object to indicate the alarms corresponding to the
unusual error condition detected. A value of 'testing' or 'down' is
equivalent to an entStateOper value of 'disabled'.
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
4. Textual Conventions
ENTITY-STATE-TC-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, mib-2 FROM SNMPv2-SMI
TEXTUAL-CONVENTION FROM SNMPv2-TC;
entityStateTc MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "200511220000Z"
ORGANIZATION "IETF Entity MIB Working Group"
CONTACT-INFO
"General Discussion: entmib@ietf.org
To Subscribe:
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/entmib-charter.html
Sharon Chisholm
Nortel Networks
PO Box 3511 Station C
Ottawa, Ont. K1Y 4H7
Canada
schishol@nortel.com
David T. Perkins
548 Qualbrook Ct
San Jose, CA 95110
USA
Phone: 408 394-8702
dperkins@snmpinfo.com"
DESCRIPTION
"This MIB defines state textual conventions.
Copyright (C) The Internet Society 2005. This version
of this MIB module is part of RFC 4268; see the RFC
itself for full legal notices."
REVISION "200511220000Z"
DESCRIPTION
"Initial version, published as RFC 4268."
::= { mib-2 130 }
EntityAdminState ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
" Represents the various possible administrative states.
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
A value of 'locked' means the resource is administratively
prohibited from use. A value of 'shuttingDown' means that
usage is administratively limited to current instances of
use. A value of 'unlocked' means the resource is not
administratively prohibited from use. A value of
'unknown' means that this resource is unable to
report administrative state."
SYNTAX INTEGER
{
unknown (1),
locked (2),
shuttingDown (3),
unlocked (4)
}
EntityOperState ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
" Represents the possible values of operational states.
A value of 'disabled' means the resource is totally
inoperable. A value of 'enabled' means the resource
is partially or fully operable. A value of 'testing'
means the resource is currently being tested
and cannot therefore report whether it is operational
or not. A value of 'unknown' means that this
resource is unable to report operational state."
SYNTAX INTEGER
{
unknown (1),
disabled (2),
enabled (3),
testing (4)
}
EntityUsageState ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
" Represents the possible values of usage states.
A value of 'idle' means the resource is servicing no
users. A value of 'active' means the resource is
currently in use and it has sufficient spare capacity
to provide for additional users. A value of 'busy'
means the resource is currently in use, but it
currently has no spare capacity to provide for
additional users. A value of 'unknown' means
that this resource is unable to report usage state."
SYNTAX INTEGER
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
{
unknown (1),
idle (2),
active (3),
busy (4)
}
EntityAlarmStatus ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
" Represents the possible values of alarm status.
An Alarm [RFC3877] is a persistent indication
of an error or warning condition.
When no bits of this attribute are set, then no active
alarms are known against this entity and it is not under
repair.
When the 'value of underRepair' is set, the resource is
currently being repaired, which, depending on the
implementation, may make the other values in this bit
string not meaningful.
When the value of 'critical' is set, one or more critical
alarms are active against the resource. When the value
of 'major' is set, one or more major alarms are active
against the resource. When the value of 'minor' is set,
one or more minor alarms are active against the resource.
When the value of 'warning' is set, one or more warning
alarms are active against the resource. When the value
of 'indeterminate' is set, one or more alarms of whose
perceived severity cannot be determined are active
against this resource.
A value of 'unknown' means that this resource is
unable to report alarm state."
SYNTAX BITS
{
unknown (0),
underRepair (1),
critical(2),
major(3),
minor(4),
-- The following are not defined in X.733
warning (5),
indeterminate (6)
}
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
EntityStandbyStatus ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
" Represents the possible values of standby status.
A value of 'hotStandby' means the resource is not
providing service, but it will be immediately able to
take over the role of the resource to be backed up,
without the need for initialization activity, and will
contain the same information as the resource to be
backed up. A value of 'coldStandy' means that the
resource is to back up another resource, but will not
be immediately able to take over the role of a resource
to be backed up, and will require some initialization
activity. A value of 'providingService' means the
resource is providing service. A value of
'unknown' means that this resource is unable to
report standby state."
SYNTAX INTEGER
{
unknown (1),
hotStandby (2),
coldStandby (3),
providingService (4)
}
END
5. Definitions
ENTITY-STATE-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, NOTIFICATION-TYPE, mib-2
FROM SNMPv2-SMI
DateAndTime
FROM SNMPv2-TC
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP, NOTIFICATION-GROUP
FROM SNMPv2-CONF
entPhysicalIndex
FROM ENTITY-MIB
EntityAdminState, EntityOperState, EntityUsageState,
EntityAlarmStatus, EntityStandbyStatus
FROM ENTITY-STATE-TC-MIB;
entityStateMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "200511220000Z"
ORGANIZATION "IETF Entity MIB Working Group"
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
CONTACT-INFO
" General Discussion: entmib@ietf.org
To Subscribe:
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/entmib-charter.html
Sharon Chisholm
Nortel Networks
PO Box 3511 Station C
Ottawa, Ont. K1Y 4H7
Canada
schishol@nortel.com
David T. Perkins
548 Qualbrook Ct
San Jose, CA 95110
USA
Phone: 408 394-8702
dperkins@snmpinfo.com
"
DESCRIPTION
"This MIB defines a state extension to the Entity MIB.
Copyright (C) The Internet Society 2005. This version
of this MIB module is part of RFC 4268; see the RFC
itself for full legal notices."
REVISION "200511220000Z"
DESCRIPTION
"Initial version, published as RFC 4268."
::= { mib-2 131 }
-- Entity State Objects
entStateObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityStateMIB 1 }
entStateTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF EntStateEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A table of information about state/status of entities.
This is a sparse augment of the entPhysicalTable. Entries
appear in this table for values of
entPhysicalClass [RFC4133] that in this implementation
are able to report any of the state or status stored in
this table.
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
"
::= { entStateObjects 1 }
entStateEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX EntStateEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"State information about this physical entity."
INDEX { entPhysicalIndex }
::= { entStateTable 1 }
EntStateEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
entStateLastChanged DateAndTime,
entStateAdmin EntityAdminState,
entStateOper EntityOperState,
entStateUsage EntityUsageState,
entStateAlarm EntityAlarmStatus,
entStateStandby EntityStandbyStatus
}
entStateLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX DateAndTime
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The value of this object is the date and
time when the value of any of entStateAdmin,
entStateOper, entStateUsage, entStateAlarm,
or entStateStandby changed for this entity.
If there has been no change since
the last re-initialization of the local system,
this object contains the date and time of
local system initialization. If there has been
no change since the entity was added to the
local system, this object contains the date and
time of the insertion."
::= { entStateEntry 1 }
entStateAdmin OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX EntityAdminState
MAX-ACCESS read-write
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The administrative state for this entity.
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
This object refers to an entities administrative
permission to service both other entities within
its containment hierarchy as well other users of
its services defined by means outside the scope
of this MIB.
Setting this object to 'notSupported' will result
in an 'inconsistentValue' error. For entities that
do not support administrative state, all set
operations will result in an 'inconsistentValue'
error.
Some physical entities exhibit only a subset of the
remaining administrative state values. Some entities
cannot be locked, and hence this object exhibits only
the 'unlocked' state. Other entities cannot be shutdown
gracefully, and hence this object does not exhibit the
'shuttingDown' state. A value of 'inconsistentValue'
will be returned if attempts are made to set this
object to values not supported by its administrative
model."
::= { entStateEntry 2 }
entStateOper OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX EntityOperState
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The operational state for this entity.
Note that unlike the state model used within the
Interfaces MIB [RFC2863], this object does not follow
the administrative state. An administrative state of
down does not predict an operational state
of disabled.
A value of 'testing' means that entity currently being
tested and cannot therefore report whether it is
operational or not.
A value of 'disabled' means that an entity is totally
inoperable and unable to provide service both to entities
within its containment hierarchy, or to other receivers
of its service as defined in ways outside the scope of
this MIB.
A value of 'enabled' means that an entity is fully or
partially operable and able to provide service both to
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
entities within its containment hierarchy, or to other
receivers of its service as defined in ways outside the
scope of this MIB.
Note that some implementations may not be able to
accurately report entStateOper while the
entStateAdmin object has a value other than 'unlocked'.
In these cases, this object MUST have a value
of 'unknown'."
::= { entStateEntry 3 }
entStateUsage OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX EntityUsageState
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The usage state for this entity.
This object refers to an entity's ability to service more
physical entities in a containment hierarchy. A value
of 'idle' means this entity is able to contain other
entities but that no other entity is currently
contained within this entity.
A value of 'active' means that at least one entity is
contained within this entity, but that it could handle
more. A value of 'busy' means that the entity is unable
to handle any additional entities being contained in it.
Some entities will exhibit only a subset of the
usage state values. Entities that are unable to ever
service any entities within a containment hierarchy will
always have a usage state of 'busy'. Some entities will
only ever be able to support one entity within its
containment hierarchy and will therefore only exhibit
values of 'idle' and 'busy'."
::= { entStateEntry 4 }
entStateAlarm OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX EntityAlarmStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The alarm status for this entity. It does not include
the alarms raised on child components within its
containment hierarchy.
A value of 'unknown' means that this entity is
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
unable to report alarm state. Note that this differs
from 'indeterminate', which means that alarm state
is supported and there are alarms against this entity,
but the severity of some of the alarms is not known.
If no bits are set, then this entity supports reporting
of alarms, but there are currently no active alarms
against this entity."
::= { entStateEntry 5 }
entStateStandby OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX EntityStandbyStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The standby status for this entity.
Some entities will exhibit only a subset of the
remaining standby state values. If this entity
cannot operate in a standby role, the value of this
object will always be 'providingService'."
::= { entStateEntry 6 }
-- Notifications
entStateNotifications OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityStateMIB 0 }
entStateOperEnabled NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS { entStateAdmin,
entStateAlarm
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entStateOperEnabled notification signifies that the
SNMP entity, acting in an agent role, has detected that
the entStateOper object for one of its entities has
transitioned into the 'enabled' state.
The entity this notification refers can be identified by
extracting the entPhysicalIndex from one of the
variable bindings. The entStateAdmin and entStateAlarm
varbinds may be examined to find out additional
information on the administrative state at the time of
the operation state change as well as to find out whether
there were any known alarms against the entity at that
time that may explain why the physical entity has become
operationally disabled."
::= { entStateNotifications 1 }
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
entStateOperDisabled NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS { entStateAdmin,
entStateAlarm }
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entStateOperDisabled notification signifies that the
SNMP entity, acting in an agent role, has detected that
the entStateOper object for one of its entities has
transitioned into the 'disabled' state.
The entity this notification refers can be identified by
extracting the entPhysicalIndex from one of the
variable bindings. The entStateAdmin and entStateAlarm
varbinds may be examined to find out additional
information on the administrative state at the time of
the operation state change as well as to find out whether
there were any known alarms against the entity at that
time that may affect the physical entity's
ability to stay operationally enabled."
::= { entStateNotifications 2 }
-- Conformance and Compliance
entStateConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityStateMIB 2 }
entStateCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER
::= { entStateConformance 1 }
entStateCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The compliance statement for systems supporting
the Entity State MIB."
MODULE -- this module
MANDATORY-GROUPS {
entStateGroup
}
GROUP entStateNotificationsGroup
DESCRIPTION
"This group is optional."
OBJECT entStateAdmin
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION
"Write access is not required."
::= { entStateCompliances 1 }
entStateGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entStateConformance 2 }
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
entStateGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
entStateLastChanged,
entStateAdmin,
entStateOper,
entStateUsage,
entStateAlarm,
entStateStandby
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Standard Entity State group."
::= { entStateGroups 1}
entStateNotificationsGroup NOTIFICATION-GROUP
NOTIFICATIONS {
entStateOperEnabled,
entStateOperDisabled
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Standard Entity State Notification group."
::= { entStateGroups 2}
END
6. Security Considerations
The ENTITY-STATE-TC-MIB defined in section 4 does not define any
management objects. Instead, it defines a set of textual conventions
that may be used by other MIB modules to define management objects.
Meaningful security considerations can only be written in the MIB
modules that define management objects. The ENTITY-STATE-TC-MIB has
therefore no impact on the security of the Internet.
The ENTITY-STATE-MIB defined in section 5 defines one management
object -- entStateAdmin -- that has a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-
write. The object may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some
network environments. The support for SET operations in a non-secure
environment without proper protection can have a negative effect on
network operations.
Note that setting the entStateAdmin to 'locked' or 'shuttingDown' can
cause disruption of services ranging from those running on a port to
those on an entire device, depending on the type of entity. Access
to this object should be properly protected.
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
Access to the objects defined in this MIB allows one to figure out
what the active and standby resources in a network are. This
information can be used to optimize attacks on networks so even
read-only access to this MIB should be properly protected.
SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security.
Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPsec),
even then, there is no control as to who on the secure network is
allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects
in this MIB module.
It is RECOMMENDED that implementers consider the security features as
provided by the SNMPv3 framework (see [RFC3410], section 8),
including full support for the SNMPv3 cryptographic mechanisms (for
authentication and privacy).
Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT
RECOMMENDED. Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to
enable cryptographic security. It is then a customer/operator
responsibility to ensure that the SNMP entity giving access to an
instance of this MIB module is properly configured to give access to
the objects only to those principals (entities) that have legitimate
rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.
7. Acknowledgements
This document is a product of the Entity MIB Working Group.
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management
Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April
1999.
[RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for
SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.
[RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J.,
Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for
SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999.
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
[RFC4133] Bierman, A. and K. McCloghrie, "Entity MIB (Version 3)",
RFC 4133, August 2005.
8.2. Informative References
[RFC2790] Waldbusser, S. and P. Grillo, "Host Resources MIB", RFC
2790, March 2000.
[RFC2863] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group
MIB using SMIv2", RFC 2863, June 2000.
[RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart,
"Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-
Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002.
[RFC3877] Chisholm, S. and D. Romascanu, "Alarm Management
Information Base (MIB)", RFC 3877, September 2004.
[RFC4188] Norseth, K. and E. Bell, "Definitions of Managed Objects
for Bridges", RFC 4188, September 2005.
[X.731] ITU Recommendation X.731, "Information Technology - Open
Systems Interconnection - System Management: State
Management Function", 1992.
Authors' Addresses
Sharon Chisholm
Nortel Networks
PO Box 3511, Station C
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4H7
Canada
EMail: schishol@nortel.com
David T. Perkins
548 Qualbrook Ct
San Jose, CA 95110
USA
Phone: 408 394-8702
EMail: dperkins@snmpinfo.com
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 4268 Entity State MIB November 2005
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Chisholm & Perkins Standards Track [Page 19]