💾 Archived View for gemini.bortzmeyer.org › rfc-mirror › rfc4132.txt captured on 2024-07-09 at 01:22:54.
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Network Working Group S. Moriai
Request for Comments: 4132 Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.
Category: Standards Track A. Kato
NTT Software Corporation
M. Kanda
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
July 2005
Addition of Camellia Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
Abstract
This document proposes the addition of new cipher suites to the
Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol to support the Camellia
encryption algorithm as a bulk cipher algorithm.
1. Introduction
This document proposes the addition of new cipher suites to the TLS
protocol [TLS] to support the Camellia encryption algorithm as a bulk
cipher algorithm. This proposal provides a new option for fast and
efficient bulk cipher algorithms.
Note: This work was done when the first author worked for NTT.
1.1. Camellia
Camellia was selected as a recommended cryptographic primitive by the
EU NESSIE (New European Schemes for Signatures, Integrity and
Encryption) project [NESSIE] and included in the list of
cryptographic techniques for Japanese e-Government systems, which
were selected by the Japan CRYPTREC (Cryptography Research and
Evaluation Committees) [CRYPTREC]. Camellia is also included in
specification of the TV-Anytime Forum [TV-ANYTIME]. The TV-Anytime
Forum is an association of organizations that seeks to develop
Moriai, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 4132 Camellia Cipher Suites for TLS July 2005
specifications to enable audio-visual and other services based on
mass-market high-volume digital storage in consumer platforms.
Camellia is specified as Cipher Suite in TLS used by Phase 1 S-7
(Bi-directional Metadata Delivery Protection) specification and S-5
(TV-Anytime Rights Management and Protection Information for
Broadcast Applications) specification. Camellia has been submitted
to other several standardization bodies such as ISO (ISO/IEC 18033)
and IETF S/MIME Mail Security Working Group [Camellia-CMS].
Camellia supports 128-bit block size and 128-, 192-, and 256-bit key
sizes; i.e., the same interface specifications as the Advanced
Encryption Standard (AES) [AES].
Camellia was jointly developed by NTT and Mitsubishi Electric
Corporation in 2000 [CamelliaTech]. It was carefully designed to
withstand all known cryptanalytic attacks and even to have a
sufficiently large security leeway. It has been scrutinized by
worldwide cryptographic experts.
Camellia was also designed to be suitable for both software and
hardware implementations and to cover all possible encryption
applications, from low-cost smart cards to high-speed network
systems. Compared to the AES, Camellia offers at least comparable
encryption speed in software and hardware. In addition, a
distinguishing feature is its small hardware design. Camellia
perfectly meets one of the current TLS market requirements, for which
low power consumption is mandatory.
The algorithm specification and object identifiers are described in
[Camellia-Desc]. The Camellia homepage,
http://info.isl.ntt.co.jp/camellia/, contains a wealth of information
about camellia, including detailed specification, security analysis,
performance figures, reference implementation, and test vectors.
1.2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT",
"RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document (in uppercase,
as shown) are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
2. Proposed Cipher Suites
The new cipher suites proposed here have the following definitions:
CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA = { 0x00,0x41 };
CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA = { 0x00,0x42 };
CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA = { 0x00,0x43 };
CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA = { 0x00,0x44 };
Moriai, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 4132 Camellia Cipher Suites for TLS July 2005
CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA = { 0x00,0x45 };
CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA = { 0x00,0x46 };
CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA = { 0x00,0x84 };
CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA = { 0x00,0x85 };
CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA = { 0x00,0x86 };
CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA = { 0x00,0x87 };
CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA = { 0x00,0x88 };
CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA = { 0x00,0x89 };
3. Cipher Suite Definitions
3.1. Cipher
All the cipher suites described here use Camellia in cipher block
chaining (CBC) mode as a bulk cipher algorithm. Camellia is a 128-
bit block cipher with 128-, 192-, and 256-bit key sizes; i.e., it
supports the same block and key sizes as the Advanced Encryption
Standard (AES). However, this document only defines cipher suites
for 128- and 256-bit keys as well as AES cipher suites for TLS
[AES-TLS]. These cipher suites are efficient and practical enough
for most uses, including high-security applications.
Key Expanded Effective IV Block
Cipher Type Material Key Material Key Bits Size Size
CAMELLIA_128_CBC Block 16 16 128 16 16
CAMELLIA_256_CBC Block 32 32 256 16 16
3.2. Hash
All the cipher suites described here use SHA-1 [SHA-1] in a Hashed
Message Authentication Code (HMAC) construction, as described in
section 5 of [TLS].
3.3. Key Exchange
The cipher suites defined here differ in the type of certificate and
key exchange method. They use the following options:
Cipher Suite Key Exchange Algorithm
TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA RSA
TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA DH_DSS
TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA DH_RSA
TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA DHE_DSS
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA DHE_RSA
TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA DH_anon
Moriai, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 4132 Camellia Cipher Suites for TLS July 2005
TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA RSA
TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA DH_DSS
TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA DH_RSA
TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA DHE_DSS
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA DHE_RSA
TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA DH_anon
For the meanings of the terms RSA, DH_DSS, DH_RSA, DHE_DSS, DHE_RSA,
and DH_anon, please refer to sections 7.4.2 and 7.4.3 of [TLS].
4. Security Considerations
It is not believed that the new cipher suites are ever less secure
than the corresponding older ones. Camellia is considered secure,
and it has withstood extensive cryptanalytic efforts in several open,
worldwide cryptographic evaluation projects [CRYPTREC][NESSIE].
At the time of writing this document, there are no known weak keys
for Camellia.
For other security considerations, please refer to the security
considerations of the corresponding older cipher suites described in
[TLS] and [AES-TLS].
5. References
5.1. Normative References
[Camellia-Desc] Matsui, M., Nakajima, J., and S. Moriai, "A
Description of the Camellia Encryption Algorithm",
RFC 3713, April 2004.
[TLS] Dierks, T. and C. Allen, "The TLS Protocol Version
1.0", RFC 2246, January 1999.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
5.2. Informative References
[CamelliaTech] Aoki, K., Ichikawa, T., Kanda, M., Matsui, M.,
Moriai, S., Nakajima, J., and Tokita, T., "Camellia:
A 128-Bit Block Cipher Suitable for Multiple
Platforms - Design and Analysis -", In Selected Areas
in Cryptography, 7th Annual International Workshop,
SAC 2000, August 2000, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in
Computer Science 2012, pp.39-56, Springer-Verlag,
2001.
Moriai, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 4132 Camellia Cipher Suites for TLS July 2005
[Camellia-CMS] Moriai, S. and A. Kato, "Use of the Camellia
Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax
(CMS)", RFC 3657, January 2004.
[AES] NIST, FIPS PUB 197, "Advanced Encryption Standard
(AES)", November 2001.
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips197/fips-
197.{ps,pdf}.
[AES-TLS] Chown, P., "Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)", RFC
3268, June 2002.
[SHA-1] FIPS PUB 180-1, "Secure Hash Standard", National
Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S.
Department of Commerce, April 17, 1995.
[CRYPTREC] Information-technology Promotion Agency (IPA), Japan,
CRYPTREC,
http://www.ipa.go.jp/security/enc/CRYPTREC/index-
e.html.
[NESSIE] The NESSIE project (New European Schemes for
Signatures, Integrity and Encryption),
http://www.cosic.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/nessie/.
[TV-ANYTIME] TV-Anytime Forum, http://www.tv-anytime.org/.
Moriai, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 4132 Camellia Cipher Suites for TLS July 2005
Authors' Addresses
Shiho Moriai
Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.
Phone: +81-3-6438-7523
Fax: +81-3-6438-8629
EMail: shiho@rd.scei.sony.co.jp
Akihiro Kato
NTT Software Corporation
Phone: +81-45-212-7094
Fax: +81-45-212-7506
EMail: akato@po.ntts.co.jp
Masayuki Kanda
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
Phone: +81-46-859-2437
Fax: +81-46-859-3365
EMail: kanda.masayuki@lab.ntt.co.jp
camellia@lab.ntt.co.jp (Camellia team)
Moriai, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 4132 Camellia Cipher Suites for TLS July 2005
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Moriai, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]